TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FogBugz

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AA software project management system used to plan, track and release great software with this lightweight and customizable system that integrates into any project management workflow. FogBugz is designed for software development teams and includes all the project management tools developers need straight out of the box. Users can: Track projects from start to finish - With tasks and subtasks for each case with required details and track them to ensure…

    $62

    per month

    Google Cloud Functions

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Functions enables users to run code in the cloud with no servers or containers to manage. Cloud Functions is a scalable, pay-as-you-go functions as a service (FaaS) product to help build and connect event driven services with simple, single purpose code.N/A
    Pricing
    FogBugzGoogle Cloud Functions
    Editions & Modules
    3 Years
    $62
    per month
    2 years
    $64
    per month
    1 Year
    $68
    per month
    Monthly
    $75
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FogBugzGoogle Cloud Functions
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    FogBugzGoogle Cloud Functions
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of FogBugz and Google Cloud Functions
    Feature
    FogBugz
    -
    Ratings
    Google Cloud Functions
    7.5
    2 Ratings
    12% below category average
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of FogBugz and Google Cloud Functions
    Feature
    FogBugz
    -
    Ratings
    Google Cloud Functions
    7.5
    2 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Function as a Service (FaaS)
    Comparison of Function as a Service (FaaS) features of FogBugz and Google Cloud Functions
    Feature
    FogBugz
    -
    Ratings
    Google Cloud Functions
    7.3
    2 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Programming Language Diversity00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Runtime API Authoring00 Ratings6.52 Ratings
    Function/Database Integration00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    DevOps Stack Integration00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    FogBugzGoogle Cloud Functions
    Small Businesses
    Sentry
    Score8.8 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Sentry
    Score8.8 out of 10
    AWS Lambda
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    AWS Lambda
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FogBugzGoogle Cloud Functions
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FogBugzGoogle Cloud Functions
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IgniteTech
    FogBugz has been a very useful tool to our organization, and much preferred over other options we reviewed, mainly JIRA. There are still some improvements needed, but with the fairly recent acquisition by DevFactory, we have a great deal of hope for what is in store given DevFactory's focus and transparency. It seems like both DevFactory and FogBugz customers are eager for substantial improvements on the front-end, but there is/was a great deal of backend housecleaning that definitely needed to take place first.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Any sort of transaction or complex logic that is going to take longer than 250ms or accesses resources that are protected by permissions, secrets, etc. is a great use case for a GCF. Some sort of "helper function" associated strictly with the UI inside browser would not be a good application of a GCF. It would not be crazy to create/debug some fairly complicated logic inside the browser/IDE and when perfected package it up as a Google Cloud Function. I have done that many times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IgniteTech
    • Tasks, Subtasks, and notes. All three of these areas were critical for our team. Tasks in Fogbugz were a bit easier to see than in more bug based software like Trello or JIRA
    • The entire screen is used to view a task or case. Clicking on a task or case will open up and take up the entire screen, aside from the sidebar nav columns. I like to see details and I think Fogbugz does this very well, using up as much digital real estate as possible.
    • Flowcharting in Fogbugz with Creately is nice - instead of getting an exterior flowchart software like Lucidchart, Creately works right in Fogbugz.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • integration with oAuth
    • integration with Firebase
    • integration with React Frontend
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IgniteTech
    • The simplicity of a single admin type user is not great because anyone who can create a job or client in the system, can also add and delete users. Content and User administrative rights should be separated.
    • There are ways to change the terminology/lexicon within the tool, but we are not able to get it to work even after reaching out to tech support. So we are forced to use the system terminology that doesn't match up to our company making training a bit difficult.
    • There is a subscribe function that you can opt into, there should be a way to add subscribers as you create a new task.
    Read full review
    Google
    • Needing a zip file is problematic (when wanting to automate deployment for example).
    • Requires another solution to execute automatically (ex. cloud scheduler).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IgniteTech
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    The console UI is pretty nasty. Managing various authentication/permissions configurations is just a nightmare. On the other hand, once you are over the hump it's not so bad. AWS Lambda is no better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IgniteTech
    No answers on this topic
    Google
    Documentation is provided and clear for this service. Although GCP support is included in the current contract we didn't get to use it since the process is pretty straightforward.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IgniteTech
    I like JIRA a lot better than Fogbugz for many reasons. If I had a choice, I'd use JIRA every time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    It is easier to keep everything in house when we are using GCP or AWS. To mix Lambda with google cloud is not a best practice and will cause problems ahead. The segmentation is clear, if you are using google, you use Google Cloud Functions. if you are on Amazon, you use all AWS tools. You can't mix them. The price is set.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IgniteTech
    • Saves time by quickly allowing Developers to make the necessary notes without getting bogged down in bloated UIs
    • Has allowed us to look back easily and see the exact code changes made for the exact Case to aid in decisions for current changes, increasing the certainty of the decided path, without regression
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • For training purposes, it is free
    • Budgeting makes it cap the use
    • monitoring makes it predictable
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots