TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

FogBugz vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FogBugz

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AA software project management system used to plan, track and release great software with this lightweight and customizable system that integrates into any project management workflow. FogBugz is designed for software development teams and includes all the project management tools developers need straight out of the box. Users can: Track projects from start to finish - With tasks and subtasks for each case with required details and track them to ensure…

    $62

    per month

    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/ARed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes provides end-to-end management visibility and control to manage a Kubernetes environment. Users take control of application modernization program with management capabilities for cluster creation, application lifecycle, and provide security and compliance for all of them across data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Clusters and applications are all visible and managed from a single console, with built-in security policies.N/A
    Pricing
    FogBugzRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Editions & Modules
    3 Years
    $62
    per month
    2 years
    $64
    per month
    1 Year
    $68
    per month
    Monthly
    $75
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FogBugzRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    FogBugzRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of FogBugz and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Feature
    FogBugz
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    8.4
    1 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Security and Isolation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Cluster Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Storage Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Discovery Tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    FogBugzRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Small Businesses
    Sentry
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Sentry
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FogBugzRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FogBugzRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IgniteTech
    FogBugz has been a very useful tool to our organization, and much preferred over other options we reviewed, mainly JIRA. There are still some improvements needed, but with the fairly recent acquisition by DevFactory, we have a great deal of hope for what is in store given DevFactory's focus and transparency. It seems like both DevFactory and FogBugz customers are eager for substantial improvements on the front-end, but there is/was a great deal of backend housecleaning that definitely needed to take place first.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center.
    Read full review
    Pros
    IgniteTech
    • Tasks, Subtasks, and notes. All three of these areas were critical for our team. Tasks in Fogbugz were a bit easier to see than in more bug based software like Trello or JIRA
    • The entire screen is used to view a task or case. Clicking on a task or case will open up and take up the entire screen, aside from the sidebar nav columns. I like to see details and I think Fogbugz does this very well, using up as much digital real estate as possible.
    • Flowcharting in Fogbugz with Creately is nice - instead of getting an exterior flowchart software like Lucidchart, Creately works right in Fogbugz.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances.
    • Controls clusters and applications from a single console.
    • Built-in Security & compliance.
    Read full review
    Cons
    IgniteTech
    • The simplicity of a single admin type user is not great because anyone who can create a job or client in the system, can also add and delete users. Content and User administrative rights should be separated.
    • There are ways to change the terminology/lexicon within the tool, but we are not able to get it to work even after reaching out to tech support. So we are forced to use the system terminology that doesn't match up to our company making training a bit difficult.
    • There is a subscribe function that you can opt into, there should be a way to add subscribers as you create a new task.
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy.
    • Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades.
    • LCM of ACM itself.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IgniteTech
    I like JIRA a lot better than Fogbugz for many reasons. If I had a choice, I'd use JIRA every time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IgniteTech
    • Saves time by quickly allowing Developers to make the necessary notes without getting bogged down in bloated UIs
    • Has allowed us to look back easily and see the exact code changes made for the exact Case to aid in decisions for current changes, increasing the certainty of the decided path, without regression
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%.
    • Acts as a central manager for all the clusters.
    • Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots