Forcepoint Email Security vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

I have been working for years with Forcepoint--they have the ultimate package in terms of integration of DLP and mail security

Incentivized

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server reduced almost 60% of email threats that help us to reduce the manual effort on filtering the spam and phishing emails.This enable us to utilized our manpower in different sectors and improve the productivity of our company. The gives cloud based and on premises security solution under the same license and provides fist class of cyber security and threats protection

Incentivized

• Ease of GUI
• Rule creating very intuitive

Incentivized

• Neural network based anti-phishing and anti-spam for multilayered security.
• Scalable resources according to business growth.
• Flexible to use in almost all devices.

Incentivized

• Speed is not the best but its email not instant chat

Incentivized

• False positives.
• Integration can be fiddly.

Incentivized

The support could be better, but the good thing is rarely having to call them.

Incentivized

While the Cisco Email was a close second, the customization of the Forcepoint Email Security policies and reports is what won us over.

Incentivized

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is very easy to set up and has way fewer false positives than Kaspersky Security for Mail Server. It has virtually the same features as the Kaspersky alternative and it is extremely easy to set up. It feels like Microsoft Exchange Online Protection gives slightly more transparency about its conclusions, which allows users to make an informed decision about certain messages.

Incentivized

• Even though Forcepoint solution is targeted high in terms of price, the added value it provides to an organization by securing their system in web and mail is tremendous

Incentivized

• Reduced number of attacks on staff.
• Increased number of false positives.

Incentivized