Forcepoint Email Security vs. Voltage by OpenText

Forcepoint Email Security is perfect for set and forget. Very little do I need to get in and that's to tailor a policy there are minimal issues I have encountered since using the product.

Incentivized

Larger corporations that require identity-based encryption would benefit from the product. Smaller corporations that want a more feature-rich product with a better user experience would not benefit as much

Incentivized

• URL sandbox
• File sandbox
• Spam filter

Incentivized

• Encryption
• Format Preserving Encryption
• Scalable
• Simple licensing models

Incentivized

• Speed is not the best but its email not instant chat

Incentivized

• Its web-portal is pretty bare bones, unlike some competitors that are more feature-rich
• Its documentation is also voluminous, making it hard to find something since it is spread across multiple manuals for particular features.
• It doesn't support IMAP connections, unlike some of its competitors.

Incentivized

The support could be better, but the good thing is rarely having to call them.

Incentivized

Since Forcepoint is used widely in our organization, the integration between DLP web and Mail is amazing, and I didn’t find a good reason to split services between vendors if I have all the package in one place

Incentivized

FPE, which was one of the reasons for the technology and capability across large organisations made it a very easy decision. Reference customers throughout the world across FinTec's. The new cloud service models are really interesting. the amount of value in their R & D teams.

Incentivized

• Even though Forcepoint solution is targeted high in terms of price, the added value it provides to an organization by securing their system in web and mail is tremendous

Incentivized

• Decided not to use the product after looking at competitors.

Incentivized