FortiCNAPP vs. Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FortiCNAPP | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | FortiCNAPP is an enterprise Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms solution that unifies security posture management, developer code scanning, cloud identity governance, and runtime threat detection into a single management console. FortiCNAPP represents the evolution of Fortinet's cloud security portfolio following its acquisition of Lacework in August 2024. Formerly marketed as Lacework FortiCNAPP, the platform incorporates Lacework's foundational polygraph behavioral analysis engine… | N/A |
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them. | N/A |
| FortiCNAPP | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Priced by company size | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FortiCNAPP | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | 100% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | |
| FortiCNAPP | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FortiCNAPP | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Microsoft Defender for Cloud Score8.7 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FortiCNAPP | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.1 | 7.8 |
| Usability | - | 7.6 |
| FortiCNAPP | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots |





