Fraud Blocker vs. SEON. Fraud Fighters

Fraud Blocker team was responsive, well-informed, and proactive. They followed up after onboarding to make sure we were getting full use of all features and provided best practices that made a clear difference in results.

One of the ways SEON works is by preventing payment fraud and bonus abuse. SEON can verify users in real-time by analyzing digital footprints, device data, and behavioral patterns to identify high-risk transactions. It also detects chargeback. In my daily work task, I come across players who are unable to purchase due to these Chargeback errors and with SEON working on clean and on time, the issue is addressed in a timely manner and can be escalated. It stops the player from making additional purchase which could put our company at a disadvantage, in case player continues to file Chargeback, so we have control over the purchases and can have the issue rectified early and effectively.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Identifies chargeback issues
• Display all relevant info on front page
• Automatic block on accounts that may give a high red flag

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• I wish that SEON. Fraud Fighters had a live tracking map of orders.
• Maybe IP check could be more precise with mobile IPs.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

Because Fraud Blocker has become one of the most cost-effective and impactful additions to our marketing stack.

very disappointed that they more than doubled their pricing within just 5 weeks, especially after being a loyal customer for 4 years. In my opinion, the new pricing is unreasonable for startups, and they refused to adjust it by even a dollar.

Their support is great, but it would be a lot better if they would have agents always ready to help.

Fraud Blocker has become one of the most cost-effective and impactful additions to our marketing stack. It gave us back control over our paid media strategy and helped ensure that our budget goes toward reaching real, interested users not bots or click farms.

SEON: Offers real-time fraud detection with advanced digital footprinting, device fingerprinting, and behavioral analytics. Analyzes data from multiple sources (email, phone, IP address, social media) to build detailed user profiles. Customizable risk scoring and rule-setting allow businesses to tailor fraud prevention to their specific needs. ACOMS Risk Assessment: Typically focuses on risk assessment in financial transactions, often with more rigid and pre-configured parameters. May not provide the same level of granular control or real-time insights for businesses outside traditional finance. Advantage: SEON’s broader and more flexible features make it a better fit for industries beyond traditional finance, such as e-commerce, gaming, and subscription services.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• It helps positively by finding early chargebacks
• It helps positively by help stopping fraud with high fraud scores implemented
• It helps positively by stopping excessive purchases that can lead to high exposure and possible chargeback

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info