TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Gatekeeper

    Score8.8 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Gatekeeper is a Contract and Vendor Management Solution that brings visibility and transparency to contract and vendor sets, used to create a single source of truth with a central data repository, and to develop robust, scalable processes using automation.

    $1,125

    per month up to 150 Contracts & Suppliers

    Zip Intake-to-Procure

    Score7.9 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.N/A
    Pricing
    GatekeeperZip Intake-to-Procure
    Editions & Modules
    Essentials
    $1125
    per month up to 150 Contracts & Suppliers
    Pro
    $2715
    per month up to 500 Contracts & Suppliers
    Enterprise
    $4,815
    per month up to 1000 Contracts & Suppliers
    Enterprise - Custom
    Custom Pricing
    1,001 to Unlimited Contracts & Suppliers
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GatekeeperZip Intake-to-Procure
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup Fee$0.20 First Year Subscription CostNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GatekeeperZip Intake-to-Procure
    Considered Both Products
    Gatekeeper
    No answer on this topic
    Zip
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    22 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    Features
    GatekeeperZip Intake-to-Procure
    Contract Collaboration
    Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Gatekeeper and Zip Intake-to-Procure
    Feature
    Gatekeeper
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Zip Intake-to-Procure
    -
    Ratings
    Contract sharing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract editing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Approval process10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interdepartmental workflows10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Monitoring
    Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Gatekeeper and Zip Intake-to-Procure
    Feature
    Gatekeeper
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    19% above category average
    Zip Intake-to-Procure
    -
    Ratings
    Contract database10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract search10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract milestone reminders & alerts10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom contract reports10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Tracking contract status10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    GatekeeperZip Intake-to-Procure
    Small Businesses
    DocuSign CLM
    Score8.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Conga CLM
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Precoro
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Conga CLM
    Score8.8 out of 10
    GEP Quantum Intelligence
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GatekeeperZip Intake-to-Procure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.7
    (22 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GatekeeperZip Intake-to-Procure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Gatekeeper
    One of the things I appreciate about Gatekeeper, is that all of the documents are housed in one place. I no longer have to chase department people down for contracts. Having all the terms of the contracts entered into the system helps with keeping track of each of the contracts, and having the ability to monitor them in one place. Coming from a place where there was no system in place, it was a given that auto-renewals would happen regularly. Our Accounting Dept. has also benefited greatly using Gatekeeper. Before, they would have to rely on other departments to get the contracts and terms, which would create a backlog for them, especially if they didn't get it in time before the invoices from the vendors started to come in. Gatekeeper isn't a tool that is specific to one team/department, Gatekeeper can assist everyone that needs to access contract terms/information
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Gatekeeper
    • Customer service/support, they're always responsive and eager to jump on calls whenever we need their support. They've never once treated us as "paid invoice" and moved on. They build relationships there at Gatekeeper.
    • They're innovative, improving on their product, when it is already a fantastic resource tool.
    • They have the ability to customize features to fit your needs, that was one feature important to us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org.
    • Visibility to the user in a great user interface
    • Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything
    • The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool
    Read full review
    Cons
    Gatekeeper
    • This might be more of a personal thing to me, rather than an issue for anyone else, but when I'm working on a specific vendor, with multiple contracts, I have to click the back arrow to get back out to the other contracts within that vendor. It would be helpful to have a feature that you could click on to take you back to that vendor where the other contracts are kept.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • There are some duplicated fields such as anticipated total spend vs. price line item breakdown that asks for the same thing. This is a little bit tedious
    • Does not show which invoices got processed and applied to open POs
    • Does not integrate / migrate special custom fields within Zip Intake-to-Procure into other tech stacks (NetSuite)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Gatekeeper
    Whenever I've reached out to Gatekeepers customer service and/or support team, they've always been prompt in getting back to me, whether it's via an email, text or setting up a zoom call, Gatekeeper's support is impeccable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    Incredibly responsive and helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Gatekeeper
    No answers on this topic
    Zip
    I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level systems like SAP ARIBA or Oracle PeopleSoft, especially for smaller or mid-sized organizations with specific procurement needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Gatekeeper
    • Since using Gatekeeper we have a better understanding of what contracts we have, and with the customized Workflow they created for us, the contracts flow through the Pipeline based on our DOA. It's a smooth process from the start of redlining and finalizing to finishing it up with Gatekeepers digital e-signature feature.
    • Contracts are not flying all over the place with no structure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • Visibility for all necessary approvers and reviewers of the process.
    • Lack of open API to other systems (i.e Mondays, Smartsheet) is causing concerns for team that might want to move away from current tool.
    • No 3rd party implementation required is huge cost / time savings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Gatekeeper Screenshots

    Screenshot of the Gatekeeper Dashboard, highlighting forthcoming renewals, contract breakdowns and key actions.Screenshot of detailed spend breakdown.Screenshot of an example report showing the Top 25 suppliers by owner.Screenshot of a sample contract list view. Configurable by any datapoint.Screenshot of Gatekeeper for NetSuite. Native SuiteApp integration with Oracle NetSuiteScreenshot of the Gatekeeper integrated Spend dashboard.

    Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots

    Product screenshotScreenshot of Zip supports ultra-configurable, parallel workflows with our no-code configuration.Screenshot of Zip also integrates with all major ticketing, CLM, GRC, and ERP/P2P solutions. Here's an example integration card for JIRA.Screenshot of Zip has an optional vendor-facing portal for the vendor to provide diligence materials, including documents, surveys, and even bank settlement information.Screenshot of Zip's vendor-facing portal includes an optional bank settlement form with an attestation.