Zip Intake-to-Procure

Zip Intake-to-Procure

Zip Intake-to-Procure

24 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Zip Intake-to-Procure	Score 7.8 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.	N/A

Pricing

Zip Intake-to-Procure

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Zip Intake-to-Procure
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Considered Both Products	Zip Intake-to-Procure Nick Huffman Category Manager Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level … Incentivized Helpful? Francene Bernal Procurement Specialist Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Zip Intake-to-Procure focuses on streamlined data collection and form submissions while Coupa is primarily a comprehensive spend management platform. Zip Intake-to-Procure simplifies data gathering and Coupa is more for broader financial management solutions. Zip … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure There are more reporting insights and better data visualization summaries in Zip Intake-to-Procure vs. Coupa (from when I last used it in 2022). Zip Intake-to-Procure also feels a bit fresher and has a better UI experience than Coupa. The user experience is pretty … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure ZIP had much better UI and had Okta integration, Tipalti had neither. Incentivized Helpful? BB Bill Browning Director of Procurement Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Zip is by far the easiest to implement and configure, dramatically reducing the speed to value. Setup and creation of workflows to align with approval processes can be done within weeks and there is no limit to the number of approval flows that can be created. There are value … Incentivized Helpful? EZ emily zhang Sr Manager, Procurement Operations Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Zip created the best end-to-end solution vs the other solutions we reviewed. The user interface is easy and simple for first-time users to navigate. The user adoption was quick due to the visible approval chain. The Zip support team is top-notch and compared to the competitors, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure We selected Zip Intake-to-Procure to solve vendor onboarding, vendor-related purchasing, and compliance issues. Helpful? Ross Sharp Head Of Procurement Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure We haven’t really used another service like Zip before. Generally, we use Netsuite. Helpful? Carey Beth Kirkland Procurement Specialist Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure We haven’t really used another service like Zip before. Generally, we use Netsuite. Helpful? Verified User Vice-President Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Zip Intake-to-Procure has a easy to use tool with the ability to make changes as our organization evolves whereas the other tools require more time or technical support to make changes. Zip Intake-to-Procure has more of a buy side focus than DocuSign CLM Zip Intake-to-Procure has … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure We truly haven’t found other products like Zip. Helpful? MS Manali Shah Sr. Accounting Specialist Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Zip absolutely wins when it comes to complex purchases and flexible workflows. Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Truth be told, we haven’t seen any other similar products. The alternative was manually tracking in Google Sheets, ticketing systems, and in NetSuite. Coupa was probably the closest in terms of what we were looking for but they were not willing to fit it to our needs like Zip … Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Set up Pro Slack integration Pro Incredibly intuitive
Top Cons	Minus Ability to create Minus Reporting capabilities Minus Pull data

Best Alternatives
	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Small Businesses	MIP Fund Accounting Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Esker Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises	Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend	7.6 (22 ratings)
Support Rating	9.1 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend	Zip Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Zip No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org. Visibility to the user in a great user interface Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool Chanie Wiesenberg Director of Finance at Gong.io Read full review
Cons	Zip There are some duplicated fields such as anticipated total spend vs. price line item breakdown that asks for the same thing. This is a little bit tedious Does not show which invoices got processed and applied to open POs Does not integrate / migrate special custom fields within Zip Intake-to-Procure into other tech stacks (NetSuite) Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Zip Incredibly responsive and helpful. Incentivized SH Shana Hawkins Procurement Specialist Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Zip I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level systems like SAP ARIBA or Oracle PeopleSoft, especially for smaller or mid-sized organizations with specific procurement needs. Incentivized Nick Huffman Category Manager Read full review
Return on Investment	Zip Visibility for all necessary approvers and reviewers of the process. Lack of open API to other systems (i.e Mondays, Smartsheet) is causing concerns for team that might want to move away from current tool. No 3rd party implementation required is huge cost / time savings. Incentivized EZ emily zhang Sr Manager, Procurement Operations Read full review
ScreenShots	Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots