GatherContent vs. Capture for Jira, from SmartBear

We create and manage content for various client's websites. The customizable workflows, assignments and user roles help us keep everyone accountable to deadlines. It is transparent, collaborative, and more efficient for all.

Incentivized

The software works best in a collaborative environment where information needs to be conveyed quickly and effectively with visual and impromptu notes. If your group doesn't like to do things online and prefers the whiteboard for in-person meetings maybe this solution is overkill. In-person meetings happen frequently so this solution makes it easier to do things remotely.

Incentivized

• Easy to navigate interface.
• Customizable workflow.
• Set up project templates for recurring projects.

Incentivized

• Documentation
• Directions
• Ease of use

Incentivized

• Getting emails for every single change is really annoying.
• It seems pretty easy, but I suggest you take time to train anyone who will be working on it.
• API integrations could be better as it doesn't work 100% of the time.
• Layouts created are static and you can not move the order.

Incentivized

• Licensing
• Some documentation topics
• More drawing options

Incentivized

Capture for Jira was just the right-sized application we needed to make our Jira implementation more productive and effective. We didn't want to migrate from Jira, so this was the right choice to build upon the infrastructure we already had. It was the best option without pouring more money into another solution.

Incentivized

• Accountability to deadlines and roles.
• Less emails and less multiple documents.
• Large scale content management for new websites.

Incentivized

• Efficient
• Bit expensive
• Flexible

Incentivized