Gatling Enterprise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Gatling Enterprise
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Gatling Enterprise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Gatling Enterprise
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Gatling Enterprise
Considered Both Products
Gatling Enterprise
Chose Gatling Enterprise
Gatling can only be used for high-load tests with a paid license and only for tests with a reduced graphical user interface (GUI). Unlike OctoPerf, NeoLoad, or LoadRunner, we are not limited to a fixed number of users per license. Compared with JMeter, Gatling is less …
Features
Gatling Enterprise
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
Gatling Enterprise
5.8
1 Ratings
37% below category average
Record and Automate3.01 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration7.01 Ratings
Parallel Testing7.01 Ratings
Data-Driven Testing6.01 Ratings
Testing Collaboration6.01 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics6.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Gatling Enterprise
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.4 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Gatling Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Gatling Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
Gatling
Gatling requires Scala code to run high-quality scenarios. The recorder helps, but does not provide an immediately usable path. In the results, it is difficult to analyse the errors encountered during a load test. We can identify when errors occur, but it is challenging to pinpoint the cause at a given moment.
Read full review
Pros
Gatling
  • Quick simple report.
  • Heavy loads.
  • API test.
Read full review
Cons
Gatling
  • Scripting with user interface.
  • More reports.
  • Recording user path.
Read full review
Usability
Gatling
Our tests are only run via an integration platform (Jenkins), and only the results are analysed using Gatling reports. The difficulty lies in maintaining the Scala scripts, which must keep pace with changes in the application over time. New use cases must be thoroughly documented for testers who are not directly involved in development.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Gatling
Gatling can only be used for high-load tests with a paid license and only for tests with a reduced graphical user interface (GUI). Unlike OctoPerf, NeoLoad, or LoadRunner, we are not limited to a fixed number of users per license. Compared with JMeter, Gatling is less resource-intensive and therefore does not require an extensive test infrastructure.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Gatling
  • Re use existing use case.
  • Difficult to add other load generator.
  • Cost reduction for simple tests.
Read full review
ScreenShots