TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Gatling Enterprise

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    Gatling Enterprise
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Gatling Enterprise
    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Gatling Enterprise
    Considered Both Products
    Gatling
    Chose Gatling Enterprise
    Gatling can only be used for high-load tests with a paid license and only for tests with a reduced graphical user interface (GUI). Unlike OctoPerf, NeoLoad, or LoadRunner, we are not limited to a fixed number of users per license. Compared with JMeter, Gatling is less …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Gatling Enterprise
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of Gatling Enterprise
    Feature
    Gatling Enterprise
    5.8
    1 Ratings
    39% below category average
    Record and Automate3.01 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration7.01 Ratings
    Parallel Testing7.01 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing6.01 Ratings
    Testing Collaboration6.01 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics6.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Gatling Enterprise
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Gatling Enterprise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Gatling Enterprise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Gatling
    Gatling requires Scala code to run high-quality scenarios. The recorder helps, but does not provide an immediately usable path. In the results, it is difficult to analyse the errors encountered during a load test. We can identify when errors occur, but it is challenging to pinpoint the cause at a given moment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Gatling
    • Quick simple report.
    • Heavy loads.
    • API test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Gatling
    • Scripting with user interface.
    • More reports.
    • Recording user path.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Gatling
    Our tests are only run via an integration platform (Jenkins), and only the results are analysed using Gatling reports. The difficulty lies in maintaining the Scala scripts, which must keep pace with changes in the application over time. New use cases must be thoroughly documented for testers who are not directly involved in development.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Gatling
    Gatling can only be used for high-load tests with a paid license and only for tests with a reduced graphical user interface (GUI). Unlike OctoPerf, NeoLoad, or LoadRunner, we are not limited to a fixed number of users per license. Compared with JMeter, Gatling is less resource-intensive and therefore does not require an extensive test infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Gatling
    • Re use existing use case.
    • Difficult to add other load generator.
    • Cost reduction for simple tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots