geoSCOUT vs. gINT

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
geoSCOUT
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
geoSCOUT geological data analysis platform comes with preloaded data and can analyze geological data from other sources, from geoLOGIC systems in Calgary.N/A
gINT
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Bentley Systems offers gINT, a set of applications that generate and present subsurface data for mining and other purposes.N/A
Pricing
geoSCOUTgINT
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
geoSCOUTgINT
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
geoSCOUTgINT
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
User Ratings
geoSCOUTgINT
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(3 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
geoSCOUTgINT
Likelihood to Recommend
geoLOGIC systems
There are really only 2 tools in industry that have the function of geoSCOUT (the other being Accumap.) Both are similar. I'd recommend geoSCOUT for project/area specific work. I'd recommend Accumap for start-up companies who are trying to establish their 'playground' as it's easier to navigate province wide assets, whereas new maps are required for geoSCOUT.
Read full review
Bentley Systems
Suitable for all organisations that are required to collate, store and generate borehole site logs in a timely and orderly fashion. Can also be used for the storage of .ags data if setup correctly. Handles multiple projects well but is not without hiccups when used regularly. I believe it is possible to draw section views however have not done so myself.
Read full review
Pros
geoLOGIC systems
  • Well ticket information.
  • Spatial analysis.
  • Query effectiveness.
Read full review
Bentley Systems
  • Borehole logs
  • Storage of geotech data.
  • Customisable
Read full review
Cons
geoLOGIC systems
  • Cross sections are not always that visually appealing. Cross sections from Petrel look much better.
Read full review
Bentley Systems
  • Bugs bugs bugs.
  • Confusing interface.
  • Split-logs cumbersome to generate.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
geoLOGIC systems
Accumap is also a similar tool. The two tools contain the same information, although geoSCOUT has extra modules which have been somewhat useful. For the most part, engineers pull raw production, completions and facilities data. geoSCOUT is better for visualizing plans and allowing toggling of different considerations using the layer manager.
Read full review
Bentley Systems
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, Holebase feels like a bespoke piece of software.
Read full review
Return on Investment
geoLOGIC systems
  • Allowed for efficient information gathering thereby decreasing turnaround time on projects.
  • Helpful for competitor analysis.
Read full review
Bentley Systems
  • Central piece of software for collation and storage of all site data.
  • Storage and checker of ags data.
  • Professional looking logs.
Read full review
ScreenShots