TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GitHub Copilot

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AGitHub Copilot is presented as an AI pair programmer, that plugs into the user's editor. It then turns natural language prompts into code, offers multi-line function suggestions, speeds up test generation, filters out common vulnerable coding patterns, and blocks suggestions matching public code.

    $10

    per month

    Qlerify

    Score9.2 out of 10
    Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
    The Qlerify platform bridges silos between business and it, transforming ideas into comprehensive process maps, data models, software designs, and source code, with the goal of accelerating development cycles, reducing errors, and helping developers to deliver high-quality software solutions faster. Qlerify can visualise a complex discussion with many stake holders in real-time and produce actionable blueprints for developers in record-time. Some features of Qlerify: 1. Co…

    $300

    per year per user

    Pricing
    GitHub CopilotQlerify
    Editions & Modules
    CoPilot for Individuals
    $10
    per month
    CoPilot for Business
    $19
    per month per user
    Basic
    $25
    per month (billed annually) per user
    Pro
    $40
    per month (billed annually) per user
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    per year per user
    Enterprise
    Contact us for pricing
    per year per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GitHub CopilotQlerify
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Qlerify also offers team and project based pricing. Please contact us for more information.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GitHub CopilotQlerify
    Considered Both Products
    GitHub
    No answer on this topic
    Qlerify AB
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    GitHub CopilotQlerify
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of GitHub Copilot and Qlerify
    Feature
    GitHub Copilot
    -
    Ratings
    Qlerify
    9.3
    4 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Process designer00 Ratings9.24 Ratings
    Support for modeling languages00 Ratings9.33 Ratings
    Collaboration
    Comparison of Collaboration features of GitHub Copilot and Qlerify
    Feature
    GitHub Copilot
    -
    Ratings
    Qlerify
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Social collaboration tools00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
    Content Management Capabilties
    Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of GitHub Copilot and Qlerify
    Feature
    GitHub Copilot
    -
    Ratings
    Qlerify
    9.1
    1 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Content management00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    GitHub CopilotQlerify
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Process Street
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    TIBCO BPM Enterprise
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Blueworks Live
    Score9.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GitHub CopilotQlerify
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.8
    (8 ratings)
    9.2
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    8.8
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GitHub CopilotQlerify
    Likelihood to Recommend
    GitHub
    Copilit is fantastic at the following: 1. Solving simple, well-defined problems, such as implementing an algorithm, manipulating a data structure, or string manipulation and regex. 2. Implementing simple APIs that are mainly CRUD in nature, with moderate business logic inside them, which may involve some processing or passing the data through an algorithm. 3. Implementation of well-defined activities, such as implementing a connection to an Oracle DB using Hibernate or JDBC, or implementing boilerplate code for a backend service to listen to Kafka events. It is not that great when it comes to understanding and implementing code in a proprietary DSL. It struggles when implementing a major feature across a complex codebase. I believe developers should also adopt the trust-but-verify paradigm when expecting highly secure or regulated code from GitHub Copilot.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    Extremely well suited for process development and since it closes the gap between ICT and Business, for software development. It is less appropriate in cases where swimlane type of process map doesn't suit well.
    Read full review
    Pros
    GitHub
    • Make code development faster and quicker.
    • Helps write better code standards for projects.
    • Provide the latest functions from the technology.
    • Notifies about the deprecated functions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    • Streamlined UI
    • Real-time collaboration
    • Jira integration
    Read full review
    Cons
    GitHub
    • The only issue I faced is the context token size, it can be increase.
    • Sometime with agent mode it takes too much time, which can be reduced but I understand it also depends on the complexity of the given task.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    • We would have like to known about them a bit earlier.
    Read full review
    Usability
    GitHub
    I feel that GitHub Copilot's overall usability is good due to its tight integration with Visual Studio and the workspace. However, developers expect greater ease of use, as there is a learning curve to realize productivity gains with the tool fully. I think there is room for improvement in GitHub Copilot's UI integration within Visual Studio.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    GitHub
    It is useful that copilot integrates so well with vscode, which is a very common IDE. I used Tabnine for a little while but it was not that intuitive, and did not seem as helpful as GitHub copilot was. I have enjoyed GitHub copilot a lot, especially the ease of hitting the tab key and seeing quick progress in my tasks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    I haven't officially evaluated other process mapping tools. I have however used many tool during the past 30 years. Qlerify is first I am excited about.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    GitHub
    • Our ROI of the purchase of Copilot was met in less than a day. The timesave cannot be overstated
    • Programmer boredom/dissatisfaction is down because of less repetetive crud work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Qlerify AB
    • It has enabled me to achieve results faster
    • Qlerify helps find better solutions
    • Qlerify has enabled results we have not achieved with other tools
    • Qlerify's collaboration features improve team and management buy-in
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Qlerify Screenshots

    Screenshot of a simple order flow and system requirements for ordering at a restaurant.Screenshot of the customer onboarding process at a fintech startup.Screenshot of the Product Information Management Process for a retailer.Screenshot of an example of a data model visualization (Star Schema).Screenshot of an example of a high-level software design visualizaton inspired by Event Storming and Domain Driven Design.