GitLab vs. HCL AppScan
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GitLab | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | GitLab is an intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps, where software teams enable AI at every stage of the software lifecycle to ship faster. The platform enables teams to automate repetitive tasks across planning, building, securing, testing, deploying, and maintaining software. | $0 per month per user |
HCL AppScan | Score7.3 out of 10 | N/A | AppScan (formerly Rational AppScan) is an application security testing solution acquired by HCL Technologies from IBM in late 2018. Appscan supports both dynamic (DAST) and static (SAST) application security testing. | $29.99 one-time fee per scan (Choice of DAST, SAST, or SCA scans) |
| GitLab | HCL AppScan | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | GitLab Credits enable flexible, consumption-based access to agentic AI capabilities in the GitLab platform, allowing you to scale AI adoption at your own pace while maintaining cost predictability. Powered by Duo Agent Platform, GitLab’s agentic AI capabilities help software teams to collaborate at AI speed, without compromising quality and enterprise security. If usage exceeds monthly allocations and overage terms are accepted, automated on-demand billing activates without service interruption, so your developers never lose access to AI capabilities they need. Real-time dashboards provide transparency into AI consumption patterns. Software teams can see usage across users, projects, and groups with granular attribution for cost allocation. Automated threshold alerts facilitate proactive planning. Advanced analytics deliver trending, forecasting, and FinOps integration. | Pricing varies based on factors such as deployment model, application volume, users, and capabilities. A personalized quote is required based on the environment and its security requirements. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GitLab | HCL AppScan | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
97% Would buy again 150 Answers | 100% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
99% Delivers good value for the price 135 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
99% Happy with the feature set 152 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 92 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 120 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| GitLab | HCL AppScan | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | GitGuardian Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| GitLab | HCL AppScan | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.8 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 | - |
| GitLab | HCL AppScan | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | GitLab Screenshots | HCL AppScan Screenshots |










