TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GoCD

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AGoCD, from ThoughtWorks in Chicago, is an application lifecycle management and development tool.N/A

    Tuskr

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ATuskr is a cloud-based test management software. Users can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is available via a free plan, and with a 30-day free trial of paid tier features.

    $45

    per month 5 users (minimum)

    Pricing
    GoCDTuskr
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Team
    $9
    per month per user
    Business
    $15
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    $29
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GoCDTuskr
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—16% discount for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GoCDTuskr
    Considered Both Products
    ThoughtWorks
    No answer on this topic
    Celoxis
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    26 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    24 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    26 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    21 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    22 Answers
    Features
    GoCDTuskr
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of GoCD and Tuskr
    Feature
    GoCD
    -
    Ratings
    Tuskr
    9.7
    25 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Centralized test management00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.425 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    GoCDTuskr
    Small Businesses
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GoCDTuskr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.4
    (26 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GoCDTuskr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ThoughtWorks
    Previously, our team used Jenkins. However, since it's a shared deployment resource we don't have admin access. We tried GoCD as it's open source and we really like. We set up our deployment pipeline to run whenever codes are merged to master, run the unit test and revert back if it doesn't pass. Once it's deployed to the staging environment, we can simply do 1-click to deploy the appropriate version to production. We use this to deploy to an on-prem server and also AWS. Some deployment pipelines use custom Powershell script for.Net application, some others use Bash script to execute the docker push and cloud formation template to build elastic beanstalk.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    Tuskr works well for teams that want a straightforward test management solution without a steep learning curve. It's especially useful for Agile projects where frequent testing and collaboration are important. Teams looking for extensive enterprise-level customization or highly advanced reporting may find some limitations, but for day-to-day QA management, it performs very well.
    Read full review
    Pros
    ThoughtWorks
    • Pipeline-as-Code works really well. All our pipelines are defined in yml files, which are checked into SCM.
    • The ability to link multiple pipelines together is really cool. Later pipelines can declare a dependency to pick up the build artifacts of earlier ones.
    • Agents definition is really great. We can define multiple different kinds of environments to best suit our diverse build systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature
    • Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits.
    • Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    ThoughtWorks
    • UI can be improved
    • Location for settings can be re-arranged
    • API for setting up pipeline
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing
    • It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box
    • Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    ThoughtWorks
    No answers on this topic
    Celoxis
    Tuskr suits our organization needs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    ThoughtWorks
    No answers on this topic
    Celoxis
    The Tuskr App, overall rating depends on its easeiest way to use as their features and managment tool are too good. If you need a easier tool and cost-effective tool and a lot of feature in it. and its return of investment is very good. And the software is really ease to adapt
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    ThoughtWorks
    GoCD is easier to setup, but harder to customize at runtime. There's no way to trigger a pipeline with custom parameters.
    Jenkins is more flexible at runtime. You can define multiple user-provided parameters so when user needs to trigger a build, there's a form for him/her to input the parameters.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ThoughtWorks
    • ROI has been good since it's open source
    • Settings.xml need to be backed up periodically. It contains all the settings for your pipelines! We accidentally deleted before and we have to restore and re-create several missing pipelines
    • More straight forward use of API and allows filtering e.g., pull all pipelines triggered after this date
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • Everyone in the team can go and read how to perform a specific test and note down the result of it which can be viewed by anyone
    • We can filter based on results understanding what test cases are failing from previous runs
    • Helps save a lot of time, effort and minimises future issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tuskr Screenshots

    Screenshot of Progress MonitoringScreenshot of Create Flexible test casesScreenshot of Distribute Workload