GoCD vs. VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GoCD
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
GoCD, from ThoughtWorks in Chicago, is an application lifecycle management and development tool.N/A
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud brings together VMware vSphere, vSAN, and NSX into a natively-integrated stack of virtual compute, virtual storage, and virtual networking built upon IBM Bluemix bare metal servers.N/A
Pricing
GoCDVMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GoCDVMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GoCDVMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
Considered Both Products
GoCD
Chose GoCD
GoCD is easier to setup, but harder to customize at runtime. There's no way to trigger a pipeline with custom parameters.
Jenkins is more flexible at runtime. You can define multiple user-provided parameters so when user needs to trigger a build, there's a form for him/her to …
Chose GoCD
I prefer using GoCD compared to Jenkins. The UI makes sense, I like the simplicity to hit the 'Play' button for a straightforward deployment of the 'Play +' if you need to override some settings when deploying whereas Jenkins, you have the whole page for each pipeline. The …
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud

No answer on this topic

Features
GoCDVMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
Server Virtualization
Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
GoCD
-
Ratings
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Virtual machine automated provisioning00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management console00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Live virtual machine backup00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Live virtual machine migration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Hypervisor-level security00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GoCDVMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GoCDVMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GoCDVMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
GoCD is easy to set up. So if you just want to get some pipelines up & running quickly, & they're quite stable, or you can have many pipelines for different needs then GoCD is great. Still, if you only want to have a few pipelines, but with the flexibility to run them with different parameters dynamically, then Jenkins is better.
Read full review
Multiple capabilities that VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud provides are excellent and very much involved in secure data migration and management, easy to monitor server performance and the virtual capability is on top and the data analytics using the platform are provided in real-time and the reports are the most useful, especially on the critical situations within the business development.
Read full review
Pros
  • Pipeline-as-Code works really well. All our pipelines are defined in yml files, which are checked into SCM.
  • The ability to link multiple pipelines together is really cool. Later pipelines can declare a dependency to pick up the build artifacts of earlier ones.
  • Agents definition is really great. We can define multiple different kinds of environments to best suit our diverse build systems.
Read full review
  • Dashboard understanding is easy.
  • The ability to handle big data.
  • Data extraction tools are very active.
Read full review
Cons
  • UI can be improved
  • Location for settings can be re-arranged
  • API for setting up pipeline
Read full review
  • Only setting the advanced functionalities.
  • The basic knowledge can not full manipulate the platform.
  • To create reports for big data is sometime very turf.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I prefer using GoCD compared to Jenkins. The UI makes sense, I like the simplicity to hit the 'Play' button for a straightforward deployment of the 'Play +' if you need to override some settings when deploying whereas Jenkins, you have the whole page for each pipeline. The environment makes sense but can often confuse the user while GoCD simply has a drop-down to select your environment.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • ROI has been good since it's open source
  • Settings.xml need to be backed up periodically. It contains all the settings for your pipelines! We accidentally deleted before and we have to restore and re-create several missing pipelines
  • More straight forward use of API and allows filtering e.g., pull all pipelines triggered after this date
Read full review
  • Live virtual capability are excellent.
  • Great tool for the huge volume of data management and migration.
  • Data accessibility is faster and the analytical capability is amazing.
Read full review
ScreenShots