GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued vs. IBM Cloud Code Engine
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | Score7.1 out of 10 | N/A | GoDaddy supported container management and container-as-a-service products, including (since 2016) ElasticHosts and Springs.io (e.g. Elastic Containers), are discontinued under those brands as of June 2020. However, GoDaddy development services, SDKs, and other projects are now hosted at GoDaddy Engineering and some are available open source. | N/A |
IBM Cloud Code Engine | Score9.7 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Cloud Code Engine is a fully managed, serverless platform that unifies the deployment of containers and applications including web apps, microservices, event-driven functions, or batch jobs. This serverless compute service aims to remove the burden of building, deploying, and managing workloads in Kubernetes so users can focus on writing code and not on the infrastructure that is needed to host it. With IBM Cloud Code Engine users can run any workload… | N/A |
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Springs.io is unlike other cloud hosting providers. Our reactive servers dynamically resize based on demand, and you only pay for your consumption, not your provisioning. This means you can save money and not sacrifice performance. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Would buy again 14 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 10 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | |
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | IBM Cloud Code Engine | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| ||||||||||
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SUSE Rancher Score9.4 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 6.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.2 |
| Usability | - | 6.2 |
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued Screenshots | IBM Cloud Code Engine Screenshots |






