TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued vs. IBM Cloud Code Engine

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/AGoDaddy supported container management and container-as-a-service products, including (since 2016) ElasticHosts and Springs.io (e.g. Elastic Containers), are discontinued under those brands as of June 2020. However, GoDaddy development services, SDKs, and other projects are now hosted at GoDaddy Engineering and some are available open source.N/A

    IBM Cloud Code Engine

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cloud Code Engine is a fully managed, serverless platform that unifies the deployment of containers and applications including web apps, microservices, event-driven functions, or batch jobs. This serverless compute service aims to remove the burden of building, deploying, and managing workloads in Kubernetes so users can focus on writing code and not on the infrastructure that is needed to host it. With IBM Cloud Code Engine users can run any workload…N/A
    Pricing
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedIBM Cloud Code Engine
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedIBM Cloud Code Engine
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsSprings.io is unlike other cloud hosting providers. Our reactive servers dynamically resize based on demand, and you only pay for your consumption, not your provisioning. This means you can save money and not sacrifice performance.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedIBM Cloud Code Engine
    Considered Both Products
    Discontinued Products
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Would buy again
    14 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    14 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    13 Answers
    Features
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedIBM Cloud Code Engine
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued and IBM Cloud Code Engine
    Feature
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cloud Code Engine
    6.6
    15 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Scalability00 Ratings6.415 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings6.815 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedIBM Cloud Code Engine
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedIBM Cloud Code Engine
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.9
    (15 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.2
    (11 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedIBM Cloud Code Engine
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Discontinued Products
    Unlike other providers, Springs doesn’t use a pre-built container solution, instead opting for their own software built from the ground up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It would be a good solution for running serverless applications. Because infrastructure setup and maintenance expenses can be avoided, the investment will pay for itself. The time to value is short, allowing IT to respond to business demands quickly. It aided us in customizing security as well as operating a personal project using to autoscale up and down approach. Also, because there isn't much hassle, items can be pushed into production as soon as possible. Simply push a container, create an application, and you're ready to go. But, It is less suited when you have a static machine or need to keep data in some way and do not want to utilize network storage or a database.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Discontinued Products
    • Container hosting, cloud virtualization
    • Elastic capacity scaling and pay-per-use billing
    • Linux kernel containerization technologies for container isolation and control
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Managed Environment for partners and customers - shifting skills and speed to CSP
    • A variety of programming model support
    • Elastic scalability for cloud native development and speed
    • Flexible consumption model
    • Containerized workloads with horizontal scalability
    • Here is an example - live demo walk-thru delivered to partners and community:
    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCBClYgpDFg
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Discontinued Products
    • Provide more options at lower costs
    • It would be nice to see that expanded out to more distributions. What would be potentially even better though is templates. Some hosts can deploy ready-to-run WordPress/Drupal sites, LAMP instances, ownCloud instances, etc. at the drop of a hat. If Springs could replicate this with their container hosting they’d immediately appeal to a much, much wider audience;
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • the pricing structure is complicated, and the servers are expensive. I really think they should offer better pricing options and support for more languages
    • sometimes the servers go down, and they take too long to respond to support tickets
    • uploading documents is slow since I have to do it one by one, making the process much longer than it should be
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Since this capability supports a wide variety of use cases - all on non proprietary and open technology based frameworks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Consumers can purchase individual components as well as unlocking new bundles with special features and services including the extensive data management governance capabilities of the Automation range. Kubernetes containerizing for effective service implementation and an agile, flexible multi-cloud data program help both utilization expansion and deployment to be improved by this architecture.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Discontinued Products
    Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    What impresses me most about IBM Cloud Code Engine is the container workload management capability and the Cloud services and dataflow monitoring functionalities. Data security and network security control via IBM Cloud Code Engine is quite excellent and very responsive data integration functions and the first deployment is not very technical.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Discontinued Products
    • In the beginning I wasn’t sure what I should set it to for my web server, so I left it. After a while the Average usage area begins showing how much resource the container is demanding and from that more adequate limits can be set.
    • Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • [One] positive is that we have one tool to learn (and a simple one) for all kinds of deployment. We need less people to maintain the system.
    • We have saved a lot of time on trouble shooting. It's clear how it works. It's "just" kubernetes..
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued Screenshots

    Screenshot of Springs are reactive servers which scale automatically to the load. That's why you don't need to pay for unused capacity at all.

    IBM Cloud Code Engine Screenshots

    Product screenshot