TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued vs. OpenText SiteScope

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/AGoDaddy supported container management and container-as-a-service products, including (since 2016) ElasticHosts and Springs.io (e.g. Elastic Containers), are discontinued under those brands as of June 2020. However, GoDaddy development services, SDKs, and other projects are now hosted at GoDaddy Engineering and some are available open source.N/A

    OpenText SiteScope

    Score6.5 out of 10
    N/AOpenText's SiteScope is an agentless application performance monitoring tool with hybrid support across a variety of systems and vendors. Sitescope also offers automated workflow and incident identification and remediation capabilities, and rapid installation-to-monitoring processes.N/A
    Pricing
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOpenText SiteScope
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOpenText SiteScope
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsSprings.io is unlike other cloud hosting providers. Our reactive servers dynamically resize based on demand, and you only pay for your consumption, not your provisioning. This means you can save money and not sacrifice performance.—
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOpenText SiteScope
    Application Performance Management
    Comparison of Application Performance Management features of GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued and OpenText SiteScope
    Feature
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText SiteScope
    8.1
    6 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Application monitoring00 Ratings6.16 Ratings
    Database monitoring00 Ratings8.25 Ratings
    Threshold alerts00 Ratings8.96 Ratings
    Predictive capabilities00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
    Application performance management console00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Collaboration tools00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
    Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications00 Ratings8.76 Ratings
    Application dependency mapping and thresholding00 Ratings8.86 Ratings
    Virtualization monitoring00 Ratings9.15 Ratings
    Server availability and performance monitoring00 Ratings8.86 Ratings
    Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    IT Asset Discovery00 Ratings6.65 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOpenText SiteScope
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    SolarWinds AppOptics
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Splunk AppDynamics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOpenText SiteScope
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.9
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedOpenText SiteScope
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Discontinued Products
    Unlike other providers, Springs doesn’t use a pre-built container solution, instead opting for their own software built from the ground up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    SiteScope is definitely well suited in an HP server environment. It is also well suited for virtual server environments. It is also well suited for those who are happy with email and text based message alerting. It may not be appropriate in other environments where monitoring physical components is critical. Because HP SiteScope does not monitor certain physical components, it does fall short of being able to be a "one stop shop solution" in regard to monitoring. It is not well suited for those looking for logic in how alerts are sent and cascade to other people or groups.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Discontinued Products
    • Container hosting, cloud virtualization
    • Elastic capacity scaling and pay-per-use billing
    • Linux kernel containerization technologies for container isolation and control
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Alerts can be configured as per business requirement.
    • It can take remedial action, when defined for a particular situation.
    • Severity, priority of tickets which are created upon a trigger can be well defined.
    • The teams which need to be alerted can be configured in the tool itself, in case of any event.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Discontinued Products
    • Provide more options at lower costs
    • It would be nice to see that expanded out to more distributions. What would be potentially even better though is templates. Some hosts can deploy ready-to-run WordPress/Drupal sites, LAMP instances, ownCloud instances, etc. at the drop of a hat. If Springs could replicate this with their container hosting they’d immediately appeal to a much, much wider audience;
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Sitescope is particularly used for infrastructure monitoring. Other kinds of monitors cannot be set using HP sitescope.
    • Sitescope cannot have graphs like splunk which is why we have splunk as well which is an additional cost for the company.
    • We can't have a direct regex operations on data inside HP sitescope. We need to have the logs placed as a single log and then do that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Very straightforward and easy to use once you get past the short learning curve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Can't really answer this. Setup was easy and no support has really been used at this point.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Discontinued Products
    Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    SiteScope unified console is a powerful tool for operators to easily detect warnings and alerts grouped by its hierarchical organization with real-time status displaying continuously the whole health map.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Discontinued Products
    • In the beginning I wasn’t sure what I should set it to for my web server, so I left it. After a while the Average usage area begins showing how much resource the container is demanding and from that more adequate limits can be set.
    • Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Sitescope does exactly what it was purchased for. It may take some time to set it up but once its set up it is a rock solid product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued Screenshots

    Screenshot of Springs are reactive servers which scale automatically to the load. That's why you don't need to pay for unused capacity at all.