TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Cloud Datastore

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Datastore is a NoSQL "schemaless" database as a service, supporting diverse data types. The database is managed; Google manages sharding and replication and prices according to storage and activity.N/A

    IBM DataStage

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AIBM® DataStage® is a data integration tool that helps users to design, develop and run jobs that move and transform data. At its core, the DataStage tool supports extract, transform and load (ETL) and extract, load and transform (ELT) patterns. A basic version of the software is available for on-premises deployment, and the cloud-based DataStage for IBM Cloud Pak® for Data offers automated integration capabilities in a hybrid or multicloud environment.N/A
    Pricing
    Google Cloud DatastoreIBM DataStage
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Cloud DatastoreIBM DataStage
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google Cloud DatastoreIBM DataStage
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Features
    Google Cloud DatastoreIBM DataStage
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Google Cloud Datastore and IBM DataStage
    Feature
    Google Cloud Datastore
    8.4
    3 Ratings
    2% below category average
    IBM DataStage
    -
    Ratings
    Performance10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Concurrency9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data model flexibility4.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility9.92 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Source Connection
    Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Google Cloud Datastore and IBM DataStage
    Feature
    Google Cloud Datastore
    -
    Ratings
    IBM DataStage
    7.7
    11 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings7.911 Ratings
    Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings7.610 Ratings
    Data Transformations
    Comparison of Data Transformations features of Google Cloud Datastore and IBM DataStage
    Feature
    Google Cloud Datastore
    -
    Ratings
    IBM DataStage
    7.6
    11 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Simple transformations00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
    Complex transformations00 Ratings7.311 Ratings
    Data Modeling
    Comparison of Data Modeling features of Google Cloud Datastore and IBM DataStage
    Feature
    Google Cloud Datastore
    -
    Ratings
    IBM DataStage
    7.2
    11 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Data model creation00 Ratings7.18 Ratings
    Metadata management00 Ratings5.010 Ratings
    Business rules and workflow00 Ratings7.410 Ratings
    Collaboration00 Ratings7.411 Ratings
    Testing and debugging00 Ratings6.711 Ratings
    Data Governance
    Comparison of Data Governance features of Google Cloud Datastore and IBM DataStage
    Feature
    Google Cloud Datastore
    -
    Ratings
    IBM DataStage
    5.3
    10 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings5.310 Ratings
    Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings5.310 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google Cloud DatastoreIBM DataStage
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Skyvia
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    SolarWinds Task Factory
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Cloud DatastoreIBM DataStage
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (3 ratings)
    5.9
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Cloud DatastoreIBM DataStage
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    I feel like Google Cloud Datastore is well suited when the data models are simple and the possible filtering and sorting operation are not complex. With more complex filtering, the amount of required indexes increase, and so does the costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    DataStage is somewhat outdated for an ETL. I guess that's what makes it a bit lagged behind its competitors. It can be used for data processing, sure, but its performance seems to be lagging behind or quite slow given the server it is running from. I won’t depend on this application if it's handling a lot of mission-critical banking and business data.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • It is hosted in GCP, our primary cloud provider.
    • It integrates with all the services we use in GCP.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Connect to multiple types of data-sources including Oracle, Teradata, Snowflake, SQl Server.
    • Powerful tool to load large volumes of data.
    • Transformation stages allow us to reduce the amount of code needed to create ETL scripts.
    • Allow us to synchronize and refresh data as much as needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Part of the Google Cloud Platform walled garden.
    • Pay for read/writes to the datastore, in addition to storage.
    • Not many libraries exist.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Technical support is a key area IBM should improve for this product. Sometimes our case is assigned to a support engineer and he has no idea of the product or services.
    • Provide custom reports for datastage jobs and performance such as job history reports, warning messages or error messages.
    • Make it fully compatible with Oracle and users can direct use of Oracle ODBC drivers instead of Data Direct driver. Same for SQL server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    I give Google Cloud a full score because it satisfies our needs so well. We host most of our infrastructure on Google Cloud and using Google Cloud Datastore helps us to solve our NoSQL storage problem. and Google Cloud Datastore is so scalable and elastic. It saves us lots of time to maintain and saves us money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Google
    The simple implementation, together with the Google Cloud dashboard that allows data inspection, editing and querying, makes Google Cloud Datastore a comprehensive choice when it comes to NoSQL databases.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Because it is robust, and it is being continuously improved. DS is one of the most used and recognized tools in the market. Large companies have implemented it in the first instance to develop their DW, but finding the advantages it has, they could use it for other types of projects such as migrations, application feeding, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It could load thousands of records in seconds. But in the Parallel version, you need to understand how to particionate the data. If you use the algorithms erroneously, or the functionalities that it gives for the parsing of data, the performance can fall drastically, even with few records. It is necessary to have people with experience to be able to determine which algorithm to use and understand why.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    IBM offers different levels of support but in my experience being and IBM shop helps to get direct support from more knowledgeable technicians from IBM. Not sure on the cost of having this kind of support, but I know there's also general support and community blogs and websites on the Internet make it easy to troubleshoot issues whenever there's need for that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    If deploying an application in Google Cloud Platform, using Google Cloud Datastore is a no brainer because of the simplicity of setup. Other options would require more setup and configuration, and do not come with the same level of guaranteed uptime as Google Cloud Datastore. In our case, we've been using Google Cloud Datastore for 4 years without any issues and have never had to think about it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    With effective capabilities and easy to manipulate the features and easy to produce accurate data analytics and the Cloud services Automation, this IBM platform is more reliable and easy to document management. The features on this platform are equipped with excellent big data management and easy to provide accurate data analytics.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • It solves our NoSQL database problem.
    • It it highly scalable and available to meets our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • It’s hard to say at this point, it delivers, but not quite as I expected. It takes a lot of resources to manage and sort this out (manpower, financial).
    • Definitely, I don’t have the exact numbers, but given the data it processes, it is A LOT. So props to the developer of this application.
    • Again, based on my experience, I’d choose other ETL apps if there is one that's more user-friendly.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots