Google Cloud Functions vs. Google Cloud Run

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Functions
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Functions enables users to run code in the cloud with no servers or containers to manage. Cloud Functions is a scalable, pay-as-you-go functions as a service (FaaS) product to help build and connect event driven services with simple, single purpose code.N/A
Google Cloud Run
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Run enables users to build and deploy scalable containerized apps written in any language (including Go, Python, Java, Node.js, .NET, and Ruby) on a fully managed platform. Cloud Run can be paired with other container ecosystem tools, including Google's Cloud Build, Cloud Code, Artifact Registry, and Docker. And it features out-of-the-box integration with Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging, Cloud Trace, and Error Reporting to ensure the health of an application.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud FunctionsGoogle Cloud Run
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud FunctionsGoogle Cloud Run
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Google Cloud FunctionsGoogle Cloud Run
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Functions
-
Ratings
Google Cloud Run
6.9
5 Ratings
13% below category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.45 Ratings
Container Orchestration00 Ratings8.65 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings2.71 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.95 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings6.44 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.45 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings7.65 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud FunctionsGoogle Cloud Run
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.8 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud FunctionsGoogle Cloud Run
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(1 ratings)
8.3
(5 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud FunctionsGoogle Cloud Run
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Google Cloud Platform Cloud functions are an excellent way to start a serverless journey in GCP, however, using Cloud Run may be the better solution. For users not acquainted with Docker & Linux, I would definitely recommend Google Cloud Functions, however, for more experienced users, Cloud Run may be better suited.
Read full review
Google
For resource management, it is the best tool. Some features are mind blowing like permissions for multi cloud management. In market, its the best container orchestration tool. If I talk about dislike then team can work on the cost of tool minimization. If possible, they can make arrangements for phone support applications
Read full review
Pros
Google
No answers on this topic
Google
  • Can easily run our apps in a docker in Google Cloud Run which has simplified code testing and deployment.
  • Can easily scale and does not have any problem when put under a large load.
  • Has all the necessary services so you don't need to look for other cloud solutions.
  • Pay as you go model so only pay for that you've used and how long you've used it.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Needing a zip file is problematic (when wanting to automate deployment for example).
  • Requires another solution to execute automatically (ex. cloud scheduler).
Read full review
Google
  • The responsibility for data security lies in the hands of third parties
  • It relies on an internet connection
  • Integration with on premise systems
Read full review
Usability
Google
Overall Google Cloud Functions is losing a lot of benefits to other GCP services, making it less attractive to users. A simple example would be the need to zip application files and push them to Google Storage which makes it a bit complicated to automate via a CI/CD pipeline. Another "similar" solution would be using Cloud Run although the need for a docker image is there, with the recent evolutions to Cloud Run (ability to downscale to 0) it makes a lot more interesting.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Google
Documentation is provided and clear for this service. Although GCP support is included in the current contract we didn't get to use it since the process is pretty straightforward.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
No answers on this topic
Google
Flexibility of features snd customzing options tha optimized the large process and make it on the the go to reuse the same process in multiple deployments ot rollouts
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Using it for FinOps, we cut the bill in 2 for certain services (out of production).
Read full review
Google
  • Cloud Run is very cheap when it comes to putting unused revisions to sleep and running it in general is pretty reasonable
Read full review
ScreenShots