Google Cloud Functions vs. Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Cloud Functions | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Google Cloud Functions enables users to run code in the cloud with no servers or containers to manage. Cloud Functions is a scalable, pay-as-you-go functions as a service (FaaS) product to help build and connect event driven services with simple, single purpose code. | N/A |
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Score7.3 out of 10 | N/A | Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated. | N/A |
| Google Cloud Functions | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud Functions | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | |
| Google Cloud Functions | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Control and Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reporting & Analytics |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Function as a Service (FaaS) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud Functions | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Functions Score6.5 out of 10 | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | AWS Lambda Score8.3 out of 10 | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | AWS Lambda Score8.3 out of 10 | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Google Cloud Functions | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| Usability | 7.0 | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Google Cloud Functions | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |

