Google Cloud Functions vs. Oracle Cloud Functions

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Functions
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Functions enables users to run code in the cloud with no servers or containers to manage. Cloud Functions is a scalable, pay-as-you-go functions as a service (FaaS) product to help build and connect event driven services with simple, single purpose code.N/A
Oracle Cloud Functions
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Functions is a serverless, event-driven service that lets developers build, run, and scale applications without provisioning or managing any infrastructure. Users pay only for the resources used when the function is running. Functions integrate with other OCI services and Oracle SaaS applications. Based on an open framework, OCI Functions can be ported to other clouds or on-premises environments.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud FunctionsOracle Cloud Functions
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud FunctionsOracle Cloud Functions
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud FunctionsOracle Cloud Functions
Considered Both Products
Google Cloud Functions
Chose Google Cloud Functions
It is easier to keep everything in house when we are using GCP or AWS. To mix Lambda with google cloud is not a best practice and will cause problems ahead. The segmentation is clear, if you are using google, you use Google Cloud Functions. if you are on Amazon, you use all AWS …
Oracle Cloud Functions

No answer on this topic

Features
Google Cloud FunctionsOracle Cloud Functions
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Functions
10.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Oracle Cloud Functions
-
Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Functions
10.0
Ratings
32% above category average
Oracle Cloud Functions
-
Ratings
Dashboards10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Function as a Service (FaaS)
Comparison of Function as a Service (FaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Functions
10.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Oracle Cloud Functions
-
Ratings
Programming Language Diversity10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Runtime API Authoring10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Function/Database Integration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
DevOps Stack Integration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud FunctionsOracle Cloud Functions
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.2 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud FunctionsOracle Cloud Functions
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud FunctionsOracle Cloud Functions
Likelihood to Recommend
Google Cloud Platform Cloud functions are an excellent way to start a serverless journey in GCP, however, using Cloud Run may be the better solution. For users not acquainted with Docker & Linux, I would definitely recommend Google Cloud Functions, however, for more experienced users, Cloud Run may be better suited.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • integration with oAuth
  • integration with Firebase
  • integration with React Frontend
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Needing a zip file is problematic (when wanting to automate deployment for example).
  • Requires another solution to execute automatically (ex. cloud scheduler).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall Google Cloud Functions is losing a lot of benefits to other GCP services, making it less attractive to users. A simple example would be the need to zip application files and push them to Google Storage which makes it a bit complicated to automate via a CI/CD pipeline. Another "similar" solution would be using Cloud Run although the need for a docker image is there, with the recent evolutions to Cloud Run (ability to downscale to 0) it makes a lot more interesting.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Documentation is provided and clear for this service. Although GCP support is included in the current contract we didn't get to use it since the process is pretty straightforward.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It is easier to keep everything in house when we are using GCP or AWS. To mix Lambda with google cloud is not a best practice and will cause problems ahead. The segmentation is clear, if you are using google, you use Google Cloud Functions. if you are on Amazon, you use all AWS tools. You can't mix them. The price is set.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • For training purposes, it is free
  • Budgeting makes it cap the use
  • monitoring makes it predictable
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots