TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Cloud IoT

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AThe Google Cloud IoT Core is a fully managed service that allows you to easily and securely connect, manage, and ingest data from millions of globally dispersed devices. Cloud IoT Core, in combination with other services on Cloud IoT platform, provides a complete solution for collecting, processing, analyzing, and visualizing IoT data in real time to support improved operational efficiency.N/A

    Azure IoT Central

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Azure IoT Central allows users to connect IoT devices to the cloud and offers centralized management to configure and updated connected devices.N/A
    Pricing
    Google Cloud IoTAzure IoT Central
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Cloud IoTAzure IoT Central
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google Cloud IoTAzure IoT Central
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    Chose Azure IoT Central
    Before deciding to go with Microsoft Azure IoT Central, we considered Google, Datadog, and AWS alternatives. The reason we went with Azure was that the client was heavily invested in Microsoft technologies and Azure plays really well with other Microsoft products. The …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Google Cloud IoTAzure IoT Central
    Internet of Things
    Comparison of Internet of Things features of Google Cloud IoT and Microsoft Azure IoT Central
    Feature
    Google Cloud IoT
    6.9
    2 Ratings
    14% below category average
    Microsoft Azure IoT Central
    -
    Ratings
    IoT Device Management5.22 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device Security9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    IoT Data Management7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    IoT Analytics7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    IoT Integration5.42 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google Cloud IoTAzure IoT Central
    Small Businesses
    AWS IoT Core
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    AWS IoT Core
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Cloud IoTAzure IoT Central
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.3
    (2 ratings)
    8.9
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Cloud IoTAzure IoT Central
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    I consider myself very techy and found Google Cloud IoT platform very challenging to manage. The lack of tutorials and discussions to understand how each section works is very challenging. I specifically made a connection after several hours to Google Nest to third-party integration, Home Assistant. Shortly after Google Cloud upgraded to a new version breaking the connection. This was extremely frustrating. No service should take several hours to figure out, in my opinion, if it does, the platform is doing a poor job of making it easy. I'm personally very discouraged any time I ever have to use this platform. It's very hard to find answers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Azure IoT Central has native integrations with Visual Studio (like pretty much all Microsoft products) making it pretty simple to publish apps to Azure App Service, where you can host all sorts of different applications. It does a really good job of storing large amounts of data (for instance, collected from IoT devices with various sensors) and it gets stored to multiple DBs. Azure IoT Central could improve by adding more customizations, as this would make troubleshooting the products easier and make future costs smaller and easier to predict.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Integration with different brands of microcontrollers including the one currently used by Espresiff.
    • The platform is very robust and secure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Documentation
    • Support
    • Good and approachable GUI
    • Many types of subscription configurations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Not beginner friendly.
    • Needs more tutorials and walk throughs on how to get started.
    • Very complicated and unless you know what you are doing you will be lost.
    • Lack of material found on how to do each section / services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • central application
    • smartphone app
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    Although comparisons are hateful, even more so when we are talking about leading brands where the quality of their services are indisputable, the general environment of Google was more familiar to me since I use, for example, Google Firebase on a daily basis, where part of the concepts are similar, without Without a doubt, AWS services are excellent, but it was easier for me to go through the functions of Google Cloud IoT.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Before deciding to go with Microsoft Azure IoT Central, we considered Google, Datadog, and AWS alternatives. The reason we went with Azure was that the client was heavily invested in Microsoft technologies and Azure plays really well with other Microsoft products. The competitive products might be a little bit easier to set up, with more flexible pricing, but, the integrations with other Microsoft services were the deciding factor for our use case.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • The amount of hours to get things integrated is negative.
    • The amount of hours researching how to get devices integrated is negative.
    • Overall the amount of time and effort getting things working has been a negative experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • positive: connected huge number of machines as IoT devices and passed them through entire IoT pipeline until storage in a fairly short time
    • negative: we spent some time figuring out some "less-used" services because they aren't documented well
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots