Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Cloud Pub/Sub | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Google offers Cloud Pub/Sub, a managed message oriented middleware supporting many-to-many asynchronous messaging between applications. | N/A |
IBM Confluent | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
| Google Cloud Pub/Sub | IBM Confluent | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud Pub/Sub | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 8 Answers | 94% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | 94% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | 86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | 88% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | |
| Google Cloud Pub/Sub | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | TIBCO Rendezvous Score6 out of 10 | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Google Cloud Pub/Sub | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 7.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 10.0 | 7.4 |
| Availability | 10.0 | - |
| Performance | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.8 | 10.0 |
| Configurability | 10.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 | - |
| Google Cloud Pub/Sub | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |