Google Cloud Run vs. Red Hat Quay
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Cloud Run | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Google Cloud Run enables users to build and deploy scalable containerized apps written in any language (including Go, Python, Java, Node.js, .NET, and Ruby) on a fully managed platform. Cloud Run can be paired with other container ecosystem tools, including Google's Cloud Build, Cloud Code, Artifact Registry, and Docker. And it features out-of-the-box integration with Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging, Cloud Trace, and Error Reporting to ensure the health of an application. | N/A |
Red Hat Quay | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | The Red Hat Quay container registry platform provides storage, distribution, and governance of containers and cloud-native artifacts on any infrastructure. It is available as a standalone component or running on top of Red Hat OpenShift. | N/A |
| Google Cloud Run | Red Hat Quay | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud Run | Red Hat Quay | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 16 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Google Cloud Run | Red Hat Quay | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud Run | Red Hat Quay | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SUSE Rancher Score9.3 out of 10 | SUSE Rancher Score9.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Google Cloud Run | Red Hat Quay | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.5 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 7.8 | - |
| Availability | 8.0 | - |
| Performance | 8.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Configurability | 8.0 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 8.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 8.0 | - |
| Professional Services | 8.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 8.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.0 | - |
| Google Cloud Run | Red Hat Quay | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Professional Services |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |


