TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google Security Operations vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Security Operations

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AChronicle is a cloud-native SecOps platform used to proactively uncover the latest threats in near real-time, and enable security teams to detect, investigate and respond with speed and precision. It is based on the former Siemplify.N/A

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

    Score1.1 out of 10
    N/ACortex XSOAR, formerly Demisto and now from Palo Alto Networks since it was acquired in March 2019, provides orchestration to enable security teams to ingest alerts across sources and execute standardized, automatable playbooks for accelerated incident response. Its playbooks are powered by hundreds of integrations and thousands of security actions, striking the right balance between rapid machine execution and nuanced human oversight.N/A
    Pricing
    Google Security OperationsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Security OperationsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google Security OperationsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Palo Alto Networks
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Google Security OperationsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Splunk SOAR
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Splunk SOAR
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Score1.1 out of 10
    Splunk SOAR
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Security OperationsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.2
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Security OperationsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    If you have lots of log sources across different solutions. Then UDM co-relation is a game changer and well suited for you. IF you close and document all the incident report in SIEM then it's not good for you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    XSOAR is well suited for phishing detection and response. Phishing alerts are as much of a
    problem today as they were decades ago. This is because: ●Attackers Can leverage automation to launch high-quantity phishing attacks with the click
    of a button.
    ●Spear Phishing attacks are sophisticated and sometimes indistinguishable from real
    emails, resulting in compromise through human error.
    ●Security Teams aren’t able to follow set processes while responding to phishing alerts.
    They must coordinate across email inboxes, threat intel, NGFW, ticketing, and
    other tools. Each tool has different consoles, data conventions, and contexts,
    making it difficult for security teams to fill in the gaps while minimizing
    errors. XSOAR is less suited for analyzing traffic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • automation of repetitive processes
    • customized playbooks.
    • The alert triage quality.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Automation with immediate security responses.
    • Comprehensive phishing protection and increased email protection.
    • Analysis and reporting feature.
    • Intuitive and easy-to-view panels.
    • Alerts by email and sms of incidents for the administration.
    • Centralized monitoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Connector improvement
    • UX experience
    • Reporting
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    • The XSOAR bot creates a lot of noise on the summary page of any XSOAR incident. Although the filter is available to reduce the view, by default this should not be visible cluttering the whole scenario.
    • The interface has too much data on a single pane. I would love to have many buttons to just click and do stuff.
    • Also, I would love to have search areas more interactive and easier to navigate.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Palo Alto Networks
    It has proven to be far to valuable and effective to consider getting rid of it. Until something better comes along, this is staying in our product stack.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    Google Security Operation is quite good replacement of the old product. We really like it, it new product and doesn't have much soar capabilities like other solution like it doesn't provide a market place to just install new plugins. Overall it's a great replacement than the other SIEM.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Palo Alto Networks
    It was much easier than we all anticipated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    The quantity of integrations with security solutions is highest in Palo Alto Solution. The capacity to identify anomalous events is much better in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The flexibility of increased storage area is better as well. The dashboard is very intuitive about showing the most important incidents and how to resolve them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • automates repetitive tasks increasing output
    • has reduced unnecessary workload on our analysts.
    • Its high security intelligence has minimized time for remediation o security breaches.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Demisto has Eased malware analysis and threat hunting
    • With Demisto, it is simple to create playbooks and scripts
    • This is helped automate policy configurations on our PA firewalls through Panorama
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Google Security Operations Screenshots

    Screenshot of MarketplaceScreenshot of Case ManagementScreenshot of Interactive InvestigationScreenshot of Incident ManagementScreenshot of Incident Response PlaybooksScreenshot of Interactive Dashboards