TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) vs. IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)

    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them.N/A

    IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AIBM X-Force IRIS can be deployed on-site to provide a complete cybersecurity incident response, threat intelligence, and breach remediation platform.N/A
    Pricing
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPriced by company size—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    80%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) and IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    Feature
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    7.2
    6 Ratings
    0% below category average
    IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    -
    Ratings
    Infection Remediation7.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) and IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    Feature
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    7.8
    10 Ratings
    8% above category average
    IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    -
    Ratings
    Network Analytics7.79 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Recognition7.89 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification7.510 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Analysis7.510 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting8.210 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification7.99 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incident Response Platforms
    Comparison of Incident Response Platforms features of Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) and IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    Feature
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
    -
    Ratings
    IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    8.5
    2 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Company-wide Incident Reporting00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Integration with Other Security Systems00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Attack Chain Visualization00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Centralized Dashboard00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Machine Learning to Prevent Incidents00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Live Response for Rapid Remediation00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.8
    (18 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    7.6
    (18 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IBM X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Usually SOC leverages Intel from mutiple sources. The scenarios are: 1.Suitable: In large scale SOC where more than 5000 devices are being monitored and the tech stack is wide, Mandiant will play an excellent role in that scenario. 2.Not Suitable: In small scale SOCs wherein limited devices belonging to the same tech stack is being used then the analysts can rely on OSINT and it is not useful to buy the solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The application monitors data networks in the organization to generate positive infrastructure for controlling workflows. It enables my team to plan and collaborate from unified data connecting system that provides positive decision-making base. It has basic networking capacity of eliminating bottlenecks that slows workflows. The customer support team provides best technical support and leads for gaining maximum benefits. The cost and licensing terms can favor any business enterprise.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • accelerated threat response feature, prioritizing threats according to requirement.
    • Optimization of the threat intelligence , and can be integrated with 3rd party tools.
    • Features like - Breach ,Adversary, Machine and Operational Intelligence.
    • Mandiant dynamic host and the malware views along with indicators.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Immediate recognition of possible conflicting interests within a field of view.
    • Ability to assist users with Research and Development at an extraordinary rate.
    • Real-Time feedback via neural pathways to analyze data and implement independent solutions that are tailored to the specific applications on-site.
    • This entire review was written with the assistance of IRIS technology as a demonstrative of it's very real practical application. This took less than 2 minutes to write using my own hands.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Paywalls exist throughout the data set and can halt an investigation without the right model
    • Some data was incomplete or broken up between pay tiers
    • Navigation through the data lacked a definitive trail or breadcrumbs to retrace steps during investigations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Suggestion 1) "RE:View" functionality.
    • Suggestion 2) "ION = EYE-ON" in Language processing.
    • Suggestion 3) Biological GUI+GPU integration.
    • Suggestion 4) Ability to "RE:Quest" IRIS Up-link/Down-link interaction. (Inter-Act w/(EYE-ON))
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence has a very usable platform, with well-differentiated sections for the analyst, as well as the possibility of cross-searching to obtain the desired results. All this is presented with an interface that is easy on the eye and not very messy, which increases productivity and the speed with which work is done.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    It gives more ways to analyze threats and options to fixed it. This device gives more visibility on vulnerability detection and its analysis. It provides detailed reports to have more information of all malwares which help us to increase overall security of our current organization
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Secure work environment with this platform has enhanced effective workflow infrastructure. The cost of deployment and configuration capabilities with other security applications lead to main decision of acquiring this tool. The security control dashboards gives reliable performance reports that leads to quick decision-making when there are malware attacks. It gives lifecycle report for most work processes and threat intelligence information that enables my team to track workloads effectively.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • Improved incident response time
    • Specific investigations that have reduced the attack surface
    • Technical reports on threats not controlled by the bank's local team
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots

    Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots

    Screenshot of Mandiant Advantage DashboardScreenshot of Mandiant Advantage Actor DetailsScreenshot of Mandiant Advantage Actor Graph