Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) vs. SOCRadar ThreatFusion
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them. | N/A |
SOCRadar ThreatFusion | Score9 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Designed to empower Threat Intelligence and SOC analysts, SOCRadar's ThreatFusion monitors a wide variety of internet sources, in an automated manner ThreatFusion’s technology crawls, analyzes, and interprets data from surface, deep and dark web sources to identify threat actor activities, Indicators of Compromise(IOC) and other machine-readable data. ThreatFusion's different modules help SOC teams narrow down imminent threats and prioritize time and energy on the most critical security… | N/A |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | SOCRadar ThreatFusion | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Priced by company size | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | SOCRadar ThreatFusion | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
80% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | SOCRadar ThreatFusion | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | SOCRadar ThreatFusion | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.8 | - |
| Usability | 7.6 | - |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | SOCRadar ThreatFusion | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots |




