Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them. | N/A |
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | TI Ops is the threat intelligence platform built for operations, not just centralization. It ingests hundreds of internal and external sources, enriches them with AI, and aligns them to any intelligence requirements and MITRE ATT&CK gaps. Analysts can operationalize insights across the SOC, IR, hunt, and vulnerability teams. When combined with Polarity and Risk Quantifier, TI Ops helps teams act on intelligence faster and focus on the threats that truly matter to the… | N/A |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Priced by company size | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
80% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Usability | 7.6 | 7.3 |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots | ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations Platform Screenshots |









