Prism, from Dotmatics since the company's acquisition of original developer GraphPad in 2017, is an analysis and graphing solution purpose-built for scientific research. Prism is specifically formatted for scientific analyses, including analysis of quantitative and categorical data. This also makes it easier to enter data correctly, choose suitable analyses, and create graphs or other visualizations.
$380
per year
TARGIT
Score7.6 out of 10
N/A
TARGIT Decision Suite is a business intelligence (BI) and analytics platform used to automate reporting, boost operational visibility, and give teams insights that support data-driven decisions. The solution combines data from multiple source systems, including enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, customer relationship management (CRM) platforms, and all other data sources to give organizations a complete picture of their operations. …
N/A
Pricing
GraphPad Prism
TARGIT
Editions & Modules
Corporate
starting at $660
per year 2 seats
Academic
starting at $380
per year 2 seats
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GraphPad Prism
TARGIT
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
GraphPad Prism
TARGIT
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of GraphPad Prism and TARGIT
Feature
GraphPad Prism
5.5
1 Ratings
38% below category average
TARGIT
8.3
7 Ratings
2% above category average
Customizable dashboards
5.01 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
6.01 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of GraphPad Prism and TARGIT
Feature
GraphPad Prism
6.5
1 Ratings
19% below category average
TARGIT
6.0
8 Ratings
29% below category average
Formatting capabilities
7.01 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
6.01 Ratings
7.06 Ratings
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
7.08 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
2.03 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of GraphPad Prism and TARGIT
Feature
GraphPad Prism
9.0
1 Ratings
10% above category average
TARGIT
5.0
7 Ratings
49% below category average
Publish to PDF
10.01 Ratings
5.07 Ratings
Report Versioning
8.01 Ratings
5.05 Ratings
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
5.05 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
5.05 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers
00 Ratings
5.04 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of GraphPad Prism and TARGIT
If you need to use multiple softwares to compile data such as spreadsheets, another app to run statistics, or another software to make graph and layout, you can try Graphpad Prism because it can do all of this in just a few clicks.
Targit is very strong when the data is presented to the system. Because of this, we are able to report on almost all of the information that is valuable to us. When we have questions or ideas on how to better leverage Targit, they are great to work with. We track our sales progress/process in Targit and AP tracks things such as outstanding invoices, open invoices, etc
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Probably one of our biggest complaints from the user community is the inability for the user to see the details behind the data. I know with the tool you can write reporting services reports that would allow users to see the detail by right clicking on a measure and selecting Actions, but for a very lean IT shop there simply has not been time to build these Actions for every possible scenario a user might want to see detailed reporting on.
Another complaint I've heard is the inability for the user to know exactly what the data represents from the source. If Targit had maybe some type of capability to hover over a measure or dimension and see a pop up of a more detailed description this might help resolve that issue.
The most difficult concepts to teach our users is how and when to use comparisons and the syntax for calculations. Creating comparisons has become much simpler with the 2k11 release but it is still difficult for my users.
It is very easy to use and I am proficient at this point to be able to figure out how to run most of the reports I need. I have had the time to "play around" in TARGIT and really teach myself about the visibility settings and other aspects - though other users have needed help with some of these aspects - but once you conceptually understand how to build the reports, it is very simple from a power user perspective.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Everything on the back end needs to be correct, which sometimes it may not be set up or missing some variables. Some of the more difficult parts of Targit require a lot more attention and object creation to work properly
Everyone I've dealt with at Targit genuinely cares about me and my success, and they respond to questions quickly and accurately. There is literally nothing more I could ask for from their support.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Make sure all of the back end work is done prior to getting Targit set up. Every variable you may need for calculations needs to be correct and every item needs to be uniform so it is read properly.
It really met our business requirements when we were searching for a reporting/Bi tool and the flexible business model of being able to introduce additional functionally as your organization grows and requires it made the investment decision the right one for us. The functionality available in comparison to the investment is well worth it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info