TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    groundcover

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AA monitoring solution for applications run on cloud, presented as a full stack cloud-native APM platform for observability. It leverages a proprietary sensor to unlock granularity on applications, eliminating the need for costly code changes and development cycles to ensure monitoring continuity. Infrastructure Monitoring- Offers visibility into cloud infrastructure performance at any scale, and centralizes metrics in one place. Application Performance Monitoring…

    $20

    per month Per node

    IBM Instana

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AInstana, an IBM company since the December 2020 acquisition, provides APM services for SOA, microservices, containerized applications and Kubernetes, and cloud native applications, as well as discovery and monitoring for IT assets.

    $75

    per month per Managed Virtual Server (MVS)

    Pricing
    groundcoverIBM Instana
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Essentials
    $20
    per month per Managed Virtual Server (MVS)
    Standard
    $75
    per month per Managed Virtual Server (MVS)
    Self-Hosted
    $93.80
    per month per Managed Virtual Server (MVS)
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    groundcoverIBM Instana
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Detailsgroundcover breaks the customary volume-based pricing model, allowing teams to scale away, at a fraction of the cost. * Predictable price, based on nodes, not data.*
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    groundcoverIBM Instana
    Considered Both Products
    groundcover
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    61 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    53 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    61 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    40 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    47 Answers
    Features
    groundcoverIBM Instana
    Monitoring Tasks
    Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of groundcover and IBM Instana
    Feature
    groundcover
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Instana
    7.6
    3 Ratings
    11% below category average
    Remote monitoring00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
    Network device monitoring00 Ratings5.54 Ratings
    Multiple Server Monitoring00 Ratings8.94 Ratings
    Multi-device monitoring00 Ratings5.54 Ratings
    Automated alerts and notifications00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
    Management Tasks
    Comparison of Management Tasks features of groundcover and IBM Instana
    Feature
    groundcover
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Instana
    5.5
    1 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Software and hardware inventory00 Ratings6.42 Ratings
    Policy-based automation00 Ratings4.52 Ratings
    Reporting
    Comparison of Reporting features of groundcover and IBM Instana
    Feature
    groundcover
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Instana
    6.5
    3 Ratings
    20% below category average
    Performance data reports00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
    Customizable reporting00 Ratings4.52 Ratings
    Data visualization00 Ratings8.83 Ratings
    Risk analysis00 Ratings4.52 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    groundcoverIBM Instana
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon CloudWatch
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    LogicMonitor
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    ManageEngine Site24x7
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    groundcoverIBM Instana
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.8
    (60 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.3
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.5
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    groundcoverIBM Instana
    Likelihood to Recommend
    groundcover
    Backend works best while the frontend (especially mobile) still drag behind, however all data can be fetched, stored, analyzed and monitored with some tweaks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Well-suited for an org with a large application base, where many microservices are created and destroyed daily. IBM Instana doesn't require any manual configuration, so deploying the Instana agents takes very little time. Data capture from IBM Instana is highly granular and can detect even short spikes lasting a few seconds. Not suitable for legacy applications where there will be rarely any changes. They can use a simpler monitoring mechanism. Also, highly dense data capturing can sometimes overload the information.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    groundcover
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • Can monitor application(s) and system(s) with very large throughput of transactions by the second ( it gets everything !!!)
    • Provide strong drill down for your applications and will tell you where the points of failure of an application's is ( servers , network , Databases , etc you name it )
    • Very easy to set up and have it up and running when using the SaaS solution. There's an on premise solution which works just as well but requires more effort and preparation from an infrastructure point of view for your teams to implement.
    • Continuously improve their features and their agents auto-update and keep up. All while not interfering with your applications.
    • Let's you create your own dashboards and visualizations that can be tailored for different kind of users with the data collected.
    • Create your own events and smart alerts so you can know on the spot if something is happening or is likely to happen that needs addressing on your applications / systems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    groundcover
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • It's very difficult to create custom dashboards, only a handful of scenarios can be visualized to dashboards.
    • Extracting information from Instana to further analysis into excel for example is something that can be improved. Using an API to get data is very limiting.
    • Open telemetry features which allow to send application data to Instana is not working as documented.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    groundcover
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Instana has been able to fulfill our all requirement and provide out of box solution for multiple component like AWS RDS Monitoring and real time alerting setup on basis of that. it is also easy to integrate with other open-source alerting and monitoring tools which makes it easier to incorporate into our solutions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    groundcover
    Observability is core to any product, which is exactly what groundcover are doing best. groundcover was built for eBPF-based infrastructure and does it perfectly, while adding more core features such as frontend session reply and AI observability to complete the picture and up to a unified platform with alerting and dashboarding capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    IBM Instana totally alters our monitoring approach since it increases the stability of the system and simplifies the process of problem solving. And since it helps to lower the degree of alert exhaustion that we experience, it is a total game changer for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    groundcover
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    IBM instana support team is good but when we ask them for support, they keep asking same thing again and again and mostly there is no solution
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    groundcover
    groundcover is much more Kubernetes-native than both competitors, with deep eBPF-based understanding built into its core logic. Also the data stays in your end instead of being shipped externally, so no GDPR implications or other compliance issues - you control the data flow completely on your own cloud while they provide the backend and frontend to support it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Instana is much more robust and modern compared to our previous product which was AppDynamics. We compared Dynatrace and Datadog and they were very similar in many aspects. The licensing simplicity with Instana and our existing relationship with IBM made it a much more enticing option and accelerated the adoption timeline
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    groundcover
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • Increase up time by early failure identification and performance optimization based on findings in Instana.
    • Enhance user experience by mapping user issues with backend failures
    • Automated actions help fixing known issues without human intervention
    • increase support team efficiency by root cause analysis which decrease the incident solving time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    groundcover Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot