Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS) vs. Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization

It's best suited for financial institutions which are running on Oracle, SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL Server, or mainframe workloads. Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS) fits due to its high availability & low latency performance. Also, the migration is relatively non-disrupting which is very important for financial organizations. It is also proven beneficial for large institutes with mix workloads or large-scale virtualized environments.

Incentivized

I believe that Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is a very promising option for hypervisor at the moment and it seems to be improving quickly. Red Hat is doing a great job working with customers on feature set requests and improving UX and stability

Incentivized

• Intergreation of legancy storage solutions
• Single pane for future storage configurations
• Amazing replication capability for disaster recovery purposes

Incentivized

• Easiness of deployment, we can deploy the full stack completely and hardened easier than other container products
• Used to host different workloads (CNF and VNF).
• Easy to scale on both the worker and the infra layer
• Infra nodes do not require subscriptions, which means we are only paying for our workload only, and no hidden costs.

Incentivized

• Better user interface
• Unified storage to fit mid-market needs
• Complex installation process

Incentivized

• Because of how different virtualization is done, there is a learning curve to overcome when switching to it from another hypervisor.
• Documentation needs to be improved. Just finding the details to set it up is a burden that will keep some people using it.

Incentivized

OpenShift is really easy of use through its management console. OpenShift gives a very large flexibility through many inbuilt functionalities, all gathered in the same place (it's a very convenient tool to learn DevOps technics hands on) OpenShift is an ideal integrated development / deployment platform for containers

Incentivized

Except documentations and searching across those documents, everything is easy to follow and use on.

Incentivized

The product is maturing at an amazing rate, but there is still work to do to reach existing VMware customers. Most notably are the HA/DR features, and backup/recovery. We need to have faster backup capabilities, and I know this is in the works with change block tracking - but it is a challenge today. Some users are also scared by the number of volumes created by Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, as opposed to the number of VMFS volumes they are used to.

Incentivized

We have already hab cases in which our customers have a better application performance even in legacy architectures running on Jboss, and even more on cloud native architectures. Customers who hosted their applications on Jboss and wildfly, when running on top of Red Hat OpenShift could benefit from more stability and availability, and in some cases, gains of performance.

Incentivized

Speedy support

Incentivized

The learning curve is quite high but worth it.

Incentivized

There is definitely no comparison to any of the products when comparing to Hitachi SVOS. I beleieve this is the only unique product which can leverage older storage systems. Dell Avamar can be a great product if you are considering DR replication alone. The DR replication ratio is quite high in Dell avamar. However given that the current bandwidth available outweights this benefit

Incentivized

Some of the various other Kubernetes out there, including Rancher, is probably one of the biggest one. Rancher has a reputation for being very easy to implement. I've found that Red Hat OpenShift is just as easy to implement as Rancher. People just don't really know about it. Nutanix is another hypervisor out there competing with Red Hat OpenShift. Again, I think OpenShift virtualization but maybe isn't as old as Nutanix. I do feel it's more mature.

Incentivized

• Cost had bit of negative impact
• Due to stable OS and live migrations support it has allowed us to dynamically tune the capacity of our test clusters leading to better COGS for our business

Incentivized

• It has allowed us to see where we need to be in the container world. I'm going to call it a net neutral impact, not negative or positive. It has given us a sense of what we are ready for and what we're not ready for. You know where you stand.
• You don't know what you don't know, so it helps us know what we want to know.

Incentivized