HouseCall Pro vs. Timeneye

[HouseCall Pro] would be great for service techs and smaller companies but is tough for companies that do multiple types of jobs, [do] not sync well with QBO for us, and creates an accounting mess. Also does not do job costing so hard to actually keep track of jobs

Incentivized

Timeneye is appropriate when you need a basic time tracking software without a lot of gimmicks or external capabilities. It connects into your existing efforts and has a simple layout. Though it doesn't have separated or well-designed permissions, you can still separate who has access to certain jobs and phases.

Incentivized

• Online Booking
• Instant credit card funding
• Customer Text Notifications

Incentivized

• Simple to use.
• Easy to set up.
• Easy to add clients, projets and phases.

Incentivized

• Job costing
• QBO integration
• Reporting

Incentivized

• Lacking basic job reports without considerable time investment.
• Lack of overall reporting and cost per a job metrics.

Incentivized

Much easier to use.

Incentivized

Harvest wins in a direct comparison in everything except cost. It is more built out, more inclusive, has more third party integrations, and more support than Timeneye does. We selected Timeneye first and for most because of its affordability. We switched over to Harvest as an agency when we outgrow the Timeneye setup.

Incentivized

• Negative is time lost fixing books.
• Negative is having to use multiple programs to fulfill needs so it takes 2x as long.
• [The] positive is that it is very user-friendly so our team has picked it up easily and techs save time in the field.

Incentivized

• Cheapest time tracking platform out there. It allows basic project time tracking and cost per project analysis capabilities.
• It takes so long to report on jobs it might not be worth the cheaper cost.

Incentivized