HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager vs. Tempered Airwall

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
The HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager provides role- and device-based network access control for employees, contractors and guests across multi-vendor wired, wireless and VPN infrastructures.N/A
Tempered Airwall
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Tempered Networks is network security technology from the company of the same name in Seattle, Washington.N/A
Pricing
HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy ManagerTempered Airwall
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy ManagerTempered Airwall
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy ManagerTempered Airwall
Best Alternatives
HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy ManagerTempered Airwall
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
Score 8.9 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy ManagerTempered Airwall
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(11 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(7 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy ManagerTempered Airwall
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Aruba ClearPass is suited well for large enterprise networks with many connecting buildings and branches. Aruba ClearPass protects your endpoints from unauthorized or unknown devices accessing your network. You can apply policies that prevent devices from meeting the required policies in ClearPass. ClearPass will allow only authorized access for devices that are using the policies.
Read full review
Tempered
It's very well suited for geographically dispersed organizations, where deploying and managing remote firewalls and other network security functions aren't practical. Once deployed, and the deployment isn't difficult after planning and understanding the data flows of the IoT devices, the system is easily managed and flexible. You're able to allow front line operations people to add devices into a role without sacrificing the integrity of the security model.
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • You can use ClearPass authenticate using wired and wireless network devices. This is helpful that you don't have to have multiple systems to accomplish this.
  • Because devices can have different purposes Clearpass can configure groups that will specify what access they have. You can use parameters such as vendor or mac address so clearpass know what group to push them to.
  • It is very easy to view device logs. This is really helpful to troubleshoot auth issues. Once you find the device Clearpass provides more than enough info to know what the issue is and to fix it.
Read full review
Tempered
  • Low capital and support cost structures.
  • Ease of deployment.
  • Ability to work over the existing network.
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Going to the end of the page to edit the rules and save them later causes problems.
  • An AND operation can be performed within a rule, but an OR operation cannot. therefore having to write too many rules
  • The license structure seems very complex at first.
Read full review
Tempered
  • Integration with third-party security controls.
  • Automating the on-boarding of devices.
  • Reporting needs to be more detailed.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
It's a great product, does what we expect from it however it's not easy to set up. You'll likely need an integrator to assist
Read full review
Tempered
No answers on this topic
Usability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Though Aruba ClearPass offers a lot of insight and features, it is not the easiest to navigate. A lot of other systems can be figured out as you go, but Aruba ClearPass often requires a lot of research in order to set something up correctly. It's not always easy to find what you're looking for. Once you learn the basics, it becomes a lot more manageable, but it's definitely worth investing in some sort of training.
Read full review
Tempered
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
We have it as a cluster
Read full review
Tempered
No answers on this topic
Performance
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
It’s very responsive
Read full review
Tempered
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
This product has consistently provided the results needed from it and when issues arose, Aruba TAC was able to provide support effectively. In the previous question, I stated that Aruba Wireless is used as well. With those systems in place with ClearPass troubleshooting becomes much easier. I am sure other issues may arise if calling support while using another vendor for wireless such as Cisco, Juniper, etc.
Read full review
Tempered
It's pretty darned good for a new company. We had to hash through a couple of instances that no one had ever run into, but once we got to the right person on the engineering team, they were able to work through the solution pretty quickly. The nice thing is, unlike Cisco, once you fix something, you don't find three new things that have to be changed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
From my experience, ClearPass has been the best NAC server of all I've seen. Even though configuration is somewhat hard and it's hard to get training, once you learn how to configure it it works very well. The policies are very granular and scalable and the interface is a well-done web GUI that does not need any extra plugins installed, as some of Cisco's product require. There are many more options than with FortiNAC, and many more integration options. Also, troubleshooting and logging is good.
Read full review
Tempered
The cost and complexity vs. ISE is as different as Uber and Lift are from trying to take a taxi in Duluth, Minnesota. The complexity of Cisco's IoT security is a joke. It was going to take us over a year just to deploy all the Cisco equipment, and that was if we could have gotten it all working together. We got the entire project deployed in just under 3 months, and that includes working out all the bugs and logistics. Honestly, I don't think all the Cisco parts would have ever been running like Cisco promised it would. It's just way too complicated.
Read full review
Scalability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
It’s very reliable
Read full review
Tempered
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Got the job done
Read full review
Tempered
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • ClearPass has streamlined everything so we don't have to have as many people managing our device auth systems.
  • Our Security team loves that ClearPass can deny unauthorized users and devices from the network. This alone has probably saved us a lot of money and headaches.
Read full review
Tempered
  • Capital cost to deploy was 1/4 the cost of doing Cisco.
  • People and time frame to do the entire deployment was 1/12th the time/people to complete the installation.
  • On-going management is being done without adding staff.
Read full review
ScreenShots