TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

HTTPie vs. IBM DevOps Test UI

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

HTTPie

IBM DevOps Test UI

13 Reviews and Ratings

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    HTTPie

    		N/AN/AAn open-source API testing client, HTTPie is now available in web app or for download, now wrapped up in a graphical interface with additional organizational features and the possibility of AI-assisted work.

    $0

    IBM DevOps Test UI

    Score7 out of 10
    		N/AAutomated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.N/A
    Pricing
    HTTPieIBM DevOps Test UI
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HTTPieIBM DevOps Test UI
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    HTTPieIBM DevOps Test UI
    Small Businesses
    TestComplete
    Score8 out of 10
    TestComplete
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    OpenText UFT One
    Score8 out of 10
    OpenText UFT One
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SoapUI Open Source
    Score8.3 out of 10
    SoapUI Open Source
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HTTPieIBM DevOps Test UI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HTTPieIBM DevOps Test UI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps.
    • Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues.
    • A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors.
    • No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer.
    • Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing.
    • Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite.
    Incentivized
    Verified User
    Read full review
    ScreenShots