HttpMaster vs. IBM DevOps Test UI

HttpMaster

7 Reviews and Ratings

IBM DevOps Test UI

IBM DevOps Test UI

14 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
HttpMaster	Score 8.6 out of 10	N/A	HttpMaster is a development and test tool for REST web services and API applications. HttpMaster can display and validate the most common REST formats; XML, JSON, and HTML and also supports powerful dynamic parameters, response data validation expressions, flexible request chaining, and many other properties. This solution can also be used for Web API testing and Web Services Testing. HttpMaster also supports the definition of dynamic parameters which can be be used to simulate variations of…	$0 per user
IBM DevOps Test UI	Score 7.0 out of 10	N/A	Automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.	N/A

Pricing

HttpMaster

IBM DevOps Test UI

Editions & Modules

Express: $0
per user
Professional: $99
per user

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
HttpMaster	IBM DevOps Test UI
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Lifetime license is available for Professional Edition.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	HttpMaster	IBM DevOps Test UI
Top Pros	No answers on this topic	Pro Built in functions Pro Supports multiple Pro Multiple languages
Top Cons	No answers on this topic	Minus Legacy applications Minus Visual basic Minus Ibm support

Best Alternatives
	HttpMaster	IBM DevOps Test UI
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.3 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 8.1 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises	ReadyAPI Score 8.1 out of 10	SoapUI Open Source Score 7.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	HttpMaster	IBM DevOps Test UI
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (2 ratings)	7.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	HttpMaster	IBM DevOps Test UI
Likelihood to Recommend	Borvid If you're looking for a tool for building and running integration tests for API apps or other website/web services, HttpMaster is the way to go. A nice feature it offers is a free version, so you can see if it'll suit your needs before paying for it. An instance where it may not be the best option is if you're needing to build and run security tests, or requirements-based testing. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Borvid Debugging Pipeline Run Prod-testing Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps. Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues. A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Borvid Introductory tutorials/examples/training. MacOS support. Json formatting support. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors. No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer. Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Borvid HttpMaster supports the maximum scrips and browser and provides assurance on different use cases to be tested Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Borvid Increased efficiency -- from ease of use. Increased reliability -- from more thorough tests. Automated test suites. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IBM Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing. Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	HttpMaster Screenshots