Hydrograph vs. Xactly Connect

hydrograph is very usefull when we need to analyze big data. in our scenario it helped a lot with rdms databases

Incentivized

When the client has source data in Salesforce, Workday or flat files, it works really well. If the client has too much data, it can be really slow or require lots of preprocessing. It's often better to do as much of the calculations as you can in the configuration rather than on the Xactly Connect side. So that regular comp admins with Incent Connect training but no Xactly Connect are able to make changes.

Incentivized

• Coupling between complex model and MapReduce framework without reducer procedure was simplified.
• The ability to reduce execution time and handle partial failure
• The framework adapts to higherned complex model

Incentivized

• Flawless data integration
• Helpful data checkpoints

Incentivized

• Microsoft azure is recently joined in 2020 that can be improved.

Incentivized

• SQL isn't the same syntax in Connect as it is in Sequal Server Management Studio, making it difficult for communities outside of Xactly to help with certain issues.
• Sometimes the scheduling part of the tool does not work as expected, but over all it is consistent.

Incentivized

Very user-friendly for a programming tool.

Incentivized

Xactly is a very helpful tool ensuring appropriate and correct data is used when calculating commissions. The interface loads timely, but it is not intuitive to use. The learning curve to be proficient in Xactly takes a significant amount of time.

Incentivized

Snap logic fits good for small/medium whereas hydrograph suits even for Enterprise grade.

Incentivized

I have not used another product like Xactly Connect.

Incentivized

• Their is no tangible ROI for us Management of bid data is easy.

Incentivized

• Saves us 10+ hours of work on a weekly basis.
• Ensures that the results are consistent without manual intervention.

Incentivized