TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Hygraph

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AHygraph (previously GraphCMS) is a native GraphQL Headless Content Management System (CMS) and now evolved as a Federated Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to unify, structure, enrich and distribute content from anywhere to anywhere.

    $299

    per month

    Ibexa DXP

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AIbexa, headquartered in Oslo, helps B2B companies to stay relevant and succeed by transforming traditional sales strategies into frictionless buying experiences, with their eponymous digial experience platform (DXP).

    $20,143.81

    per year

    Pricing
    HygraphIbexa DXP
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    $299
    per month per project
    Scale
    $899
    per month per project
    Enterprise
    Custom
    Ibexa Content - Bronze
    € 15,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Bronze
    € 23,000
    per year
    Ibexa Content - Silver
    €26,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Bronze
    € 30,000
    per year
    Ibexa Content - Gold
    €37,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Silver
    €40,000
    per year
    Ibexa Content - Platinum
    €50,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Silver
    €52,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Gold
    €57,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Gold
    €74,000
    per year
    Ibexa Experience - Platinum
    €77,000
    per year
    Ibexa Commerce - Platinum
    €100,000
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HygraphIbexa DXP
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details35% discount for annual pricing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    HygraphIbexa DXP
    Considered Both Products
    Hygraph
    No answer on this topic
    Ibexa
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    HygraphIbexa DXP
    Hybrid CMS
    Comparison of Hybrid CMS features of Hygraph and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Hygraph
    8.7
    1 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Ibexa DXP
    -
    Ratings
    Collaborative editing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content templates10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Approval and authoring workflows8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Hygraph and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Hygraph
    -
    Ratings
    Ibexa DXP
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Hygraph and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Hygraph
    -
    Ratings
    Ibexa DXP
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    0% above category average
    API00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Hygraph and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Hygraph
    -
    Ratings
    Ibexa DXP
    5.4
    1 Ratings
    27% below category average
    WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Admin section00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Page templates00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
    Library of website themes00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
    Publishing workflow00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Form generator00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Hygraph and Ibexa DXP
    Feature
    Hygraph
    -
    Ratings
    Ibexa DXP
    5.6
    1 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Content taxonomy00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    SEO support00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Bulk management00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Community / comment management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    HygraphIbexa DXP
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Yext
    Score6.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Progress Sitefinity
    Score7.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HygraphIbexa DXP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.1
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (6 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (4 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HygraphIbexa DXP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Hygraph
    I would recommend GraphCMS to anyone who is also using Gatsby to build their website. If not, I would recommend them to consider GraphCMS but also consider other options. GraphCMS is a tool in which you are responsible to make the most out of it, but sometimes this requires more time and knowledge than a normal engineer may be able to handle. But with more time and attention, the reward of off-lifting content creation from the developers is a huge time saver in the long run.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    I always recommend Ibexa DXP to my fellows. The only scenario that I would not recommend it is if the site is either too small, too simple, or that they simply cannot afford to stand it up properly.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Hygraph
    • GraphCMS is easy to work with from the "non-engineer" side of things.
    • GraphCMS is very flexible on what data models we can create and how those models are formed.
    • GraphCMS uses Graph API, which is easy to write (compared to older API patterns).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    • Content Taxonomy: Content is managed in a tree. Though taxonomy vs folksonomy is a near-religious debate among professionals, clients seeing the system for the first time just seem to "get it" more often.
    • Content Flexibility: Common content types such as blog posts and articles are available out of the box. However, customizing these and creating new content types is very easy.
    • Developer Friendly: Developers need only a little PHP experience to get started. Of course being an expert doesn't hurt and opens the door for the development of custom modules.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Hygraph
    • GraphCMS is very expensive at the enterprise level.
    • GraphCMS requires deep knowledge of the system and requires lots of time to be efficient with it (especially around creating specific data patterns/relationships).
    • Multiple times a day, the system will give us errors when attempting to save something but the errors are unclear as to what went wrong (can be irritating).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    • Limited partners when you compare to other solutions (WordPress, Drupal, etc). It took us a while to find a solid, trusted developer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Hygraph
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa
    Very happy with current relationship and websites
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Hygraph
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa
    It is quite easy to navigate through the backend and also, you can directly work in frontend view. Dynamic content can be created on the fly. Their Landing page features are awesome. You create a page by drag & drop.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Hygraph
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa
    They are directly reachable and help you to deal with other services, e.g. if would like to set up a CDN for China or if you would like to integrate a tool like HubSpot. If there is anything you are missing, they help you to find a workaround until they can deliver such items - like local language versions.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Hygraph
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa
    The partner selected makes a significant impact on the usability and experience
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Hygraph
    We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of support from other developers which makes us confident will be around for a while (and we won't need to replace it anytime soon). Note: I also looked at Directus and DatoCMS but these were not options within TrustRadius
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    eZ Publish isn't as large in community size and number of installations as other content management systems. However, it's just as capable and met our needs:
    • Developers, system administrators, and project manager can all speak the same language during the development and maintenance cycles of a site.
    • End-user training is very straight-forward.
    • Vendor support is available.
    • Client IT departments can access if need (developers/designers/sysadmins).
    • The community is there (forums) and there are solid contributions (extensions) from both the vendor and the community.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Hygraph
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa
    We’ve priced other enterprise products and found Ibexa DXP to be a bit more expensive. However, not enough to dissuade us from staying with the product.
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Hygraph
    No answers on this topic
    Ibexa
    The partner ecosystem is small. However, we've worked with two Ibexa partners over the last 10 years. They were very skilled. They were great companies. We've interviewed other Ibexa partners in North America. We found them all to be professional with solid resumes.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Hygraph
    • Better use of time for our engineers in the long run.
    • More control of content for people outside of the engineer team.
    • Allows people to edit the content on their own, so they don't need to wait until a developer is available to add something to the website.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ibexa
    • Common knowledge: By making eZ a core offering, developers, system administrators, and project managers were able to communicate with each other effectively.
    • Training: Due to its content taxonomy, end-user training often went well.
    • Support: In our case, we had Gold support from eZ Publish which saved time and helped with customizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots