1. Home
  2. Digital Experience Platforms (DXP)
  3. Ibexa DXP Reviews
  4. User Review of Ibexa DXP
Highly customizable, but limited development community
December 31, 2021

Highly customizable, but limited development community

Beth Schivley | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Software Version

Ibexa Cloud

Overall Satisfaction with Ibexa DXP

We have been working with Ibexa since 2019 to host our new websites using eZ Publish. We recently upgraded to Ibexa Experience 3.3.10 and are quite pleased with the newer design and functionality. The Ibexa developers we're working with have a strong relationship and continue to help enhance our websites. Overall, we are quite pleased with the Ibexa relationship and solution.
  • Ability to easily develop evolutions.
  • Fairly simple CMS - easy to navigate.
  • Limited partners when you compare to other solutions (WordPress, Drupal, etc). It took us a while to find a solid, trusted developer.
  • Highly customizable - though can be very costly.
  • Always watching our content object count.
Whenever we've put in a ticket for support, they have always addressed the need in a very timely fashion.

Do you think Ibexa DXP delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Ibexa DXP's feature set?

Yes

Did Ibexa DXP live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Ibexa DXP go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Ibexa DXP again?

Yes

Ibexa DXP is user-friendly and from what I understand also developer-friendly.
No major issues - performing as expected.

Using Ibexa DXP

4 - Everyone is in marketing communications
1 - Digital Manager works very closely with our developers
  • Security
  • Customizable
  • Enterprise - multiple sites
Very happy with current relationship and websites

Evaluating Ibexa DXP and Competitors

Ibexa DXP Implementation

The partner selected makes a significant impact on the usability and experience.
  • Third-party professional services
Aplyca and Almavia
Yes - We deployed multiple sites. The first was developed by one developer. Evolutions and subsequent sites were developed by a new developer.
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled