Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hygraph
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Hygraph (previously GraphCMS) is a native GraphQL Headless Content Management System (CMS) and now evolved as a Federated Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to unify, structure, enrich and distribute content from anywhere to anywhere.
$299
per month
Netlify CMS
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Netlify CMS is an open source Git-based CMS for static site generators. it runs 100% in a browser.N/A
Sanity
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Sanity from the company of the same name in San Francisco is a platform for structured content that comes with an open-source editing environment called Sanity Studio that users can customize with JavaScript and a real-time hosted data store.
$15
per month per seat
Pricing
HygraphNetlify CMSSanity
Editions & Modules
Professional
$299
per month per project
Scale
$899
per month per project
Enterprise
Custom
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
Growth
$15
per month per seat
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
per month per seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HygraphNetlify CMSSanity
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details35% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HygraphNetlify CMSSanity
Considered Multiple Products
Hygraph

No answer on this topic

Netlify CMS

No answer on this topic

Sanity
Chose Sanity
Pricing is better than graph cms. and easy to use the intuitive interface to write my blog.
Features
HygraphNetlify CMSSanity
Hybrid CMS
Comparison of Hybrid CMS features of Product A and Product B
Hygraph
8.7
1 Ratings
0% above category average
Netlify CMS
-
Ratings
Sanity
-
Ratings
Collaborative editing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content templates10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval and authoring workflows8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Netlify CMS
6.0
1 Ratings
25% below category average
Sanity
-
Ratings
API00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Netlify CMS
6.1
1 Ratings
24% below category average
Sanity
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Netlify CMS
4.3
1 Ratings
54% below category average
Sanity
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy00 Ratings7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HygraphNetlify CMSSanity
Small Businesses
Contentful
Contentful
Score 7.5 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HygraphNetlify CMSSanity
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
HygraphNetlify CMSSanity
Likelihood to Recommend
Hygraph
I would recommend GraphCMS to anyone who is also using Gatsby to build their website. If not, I would recommend them to consider GraphCMS but also consider other options. GraphCMS is a tool in which you are responsible to make the most out of it, but sometimes this requires more time and knowledge than a normal engineer may be able to handle. But with more time and attention, the reward of off-lifting content creation from the developers is a huge time saver in the long run.
Read full review
Netlify
Netlify CMS is well suited when you have very less frequent updates to your content, maybe once a day and very few people need to access your data. You can connect it to Netlify, GitHub, or any platform and have multiple people access it and do as many updates as you wish, but the process is not well-defined and you need to build your own system for that. It is well suited for projects you need to pull off with very low cost, it is essentially free as the software is open source and free to use, and all you need to do is set up your schema correctly and find a deployment pipeline where you can build your static site/API to redeploy whenever the content changes. I personally used a GitHub Login -> Netlify CMS -> next app consumer of content -> GitHub pipelines to run next SSG -> GitHub Pages to deploy the built static site. It might not be appropriate for large teams where users themselves need no-code tools to modify the schema of the content.
Read full review
Sanity.io
Customization and creation of CMS are almost limitless. Building and customizing the platform is facilitated by a wealth of documentation and video content. As opposed to graphql and traversing rest APIs, Sanity's query language is a breath of fresh air. It really helps you if you want something lightweight but at the same time you want it to be scalable then I think Sanity is your best option.
Read full review
Pros
Hygraph
  • GraphCMS is easy to work with from the "non-engineer" side of things.
  • GraphCMS is very flexible on what data models we can create and how those models are formed.
  • GraphCMS uses Graph API, which is easy to write (compared to older API patterns).
Read full review
Netlify
  • Storing content data in customized schema without a database
  • Full control over your content and infrastructure where it is deployed and stored
  • Very low-cost way for building your own CMS and CDN
Read full review
Sanity.io
  • GraphQL support.
  • Nice Intuitive Web interface to write blogs.
  • They provide us a subdomain on their cloud so that we can start testing our things directly on the web.
Read full review
Cons
Hygraph
  • GraphCMS is very expensive at the enterprise level.
  • GraphCMS requires deep knowledge of the system and requires lots of time to be efficient with it (especially around creating specific data patterns/relationships).
  • Multiple times a day, the system will give us errors when attempting to save something but the errors are unclear as to what went wrong (can be irritating).
Read full review
Netlify
  • Linking between different schema types, i.e. having some relations between content
  • Better ways to define content schema, like how TinaCMS would handle using a JSON
Read full review
Sanity.io
  • CMS can be a bit hard to work with for the new users
  • Documentation should include more examples of the output and code along with the output.
  • Custom inputs are quite difficult to start and work with.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hygraph
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of support from other developers which makes us confident will be around for a while (and we won't need to replace it anytime soon). Note: I also looked at Directus and DatoCMS but these were not options within TrustRadius
Read full review
Netlify
We really can't compare it to full-fledged CMS software, like WordPress, which has a lot of community and support with widgets, plugins, and whatnot. It's not built for that, but you can compare it to Contentful, Ghost, Strapi, etc., which provide similar functionality to a headless CMS with custom schema options, but even among them, it still lacks a lot of functionality, ease of use, and support. But Netlify CMS pros would be of the opinion that compared to other platforms where most schemas need to use their own tools and frameworks, it's very cost-effective. Something new called TinaCMS has come up to compete with Netlify CMS by covering most of its shortcomings, but it's something new being built by the same team that built Forestry CMS and comes with many modern features, yet currently only supports NextJS SSG.
Read full review
Sanity.io
Pricing is better than graph cms. and easy to use the intuitive interface to write my blog.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hygraph
  • Better use of time for our engineers in the long run.
  • More control of content for people outside of the engineer team.
  • Allows people to edit the content on their own, so they don't need to wait until a developer is available to add something to the website.
Read full review
Netlify
  • Helped us inject dynamic content into existing site very quickly
  • Wasted a lot of time to implement when something complex, such as querying content, was needed
Read full review
Sanity.io
  • It helped us to create an excellent developer experience and good experience for their editors as well
  • Sanity has created an incredible platform that effortlessly balances good DX for content modeling and good UI for content editing.
  • Pay-as-you-go hybrid service, no need to worry about reaching a cap and having to suddenly pay $500
Read full review
ScreenShots