IBM AIOps Insights vs. Microsoft System Center

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM AIOps Insights
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
IBM AIOps Insights is a solution for event and incident management that offers central IT operations teams a comprehensive view of their managed IT environment, providing holistic context in a single pane of glass. ​ AIOps Insights uses intelligent automation and AI to​ aggregate information by collecting event data from various sources in the environment, correlating related incidents, and helping teams detect and remediate incidents. The platform integrates with existing toolsets and systems…
$9.75
per month MVS
Microsoft System Center
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft System Center Suite is a family of IT management software for network monitoring, updating and patching, endpoint protection with anti-malware, data protection and backup, ITIL- structured IT service management, remote administration and more. It is available in two editions: standard and datacenter. Datacenter provides unlimited virtualization for high density private clouds, while standard is for lightly or non-virtualized private cloud workloads.
$1,323
per month
Pricing
IBM AIOps InsightsMicrosoft System Center
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard Edition
$1323
Datacenter Edition
$3607
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM AIOps InsightsMicrosoft System Center
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM AIOps InsightsMicrosoft System Center
Features
IBM AIOps InsightsMicrosoft System Center
AIOps Features
Comparison of AIOps Features features of Product A and Product B
IBM AIOps Insights
5.6
1 Ratings
30% below category average
Microsoft System Center
-
Ratings
Monitoring and Alerting8.21 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Analytics6.41 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident Management8.21 Ratings00 Ratings
Root Cause Analysis4.51 Ratings00 Ratings
Capacity Planning Tool2.71 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Remediation3.61 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration and Communication5.51 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM AIOps InsightsMicrosoft System Center
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM AIOps InsightsMicrosoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(1 ratings)
9.0
(21 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM AIOps InsightsMicrosoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
It's ideal for large IT infrastructures that have access to huge amounts of data and to proactively identify issues before they occur. It can automate repetitive tasks and responses, which helps with early resolution. It is not suitable for smaller setups with less data as it leads to a huge cost burden on the business.
Read full review
Microsoft
For companies with more than 10 Windows devices and needing to standardize the OS, AV, access, share resources, and install software. SCCM is the way to go. This software is unnecessary if the business is all remote users and not in an office-type setting. There are cloud offerings or none to accomplish what a business needs.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Problem identification with the help of data and events much before they happen ensures smooth operations.
  • Incident resolution: Provide real-time contextual information on the root cause of the issue and highlight historical data for similar events.
  • Can automate routine tasks associated with incident management, which ultimately saves time.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Allows the grouping of devices by user.
  • Allows controlling updates being deployed to user devices.
  • Allows for the repurposing of machines by being able to load new or updated software on machines that already are in the system.
  • Allows us the ability to wipe a machine clean and restore it back to the configuration that was assigned the machine.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • It has limited integration capability, especially for mainframe.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Needs web based storefront for requesting new software
  • Needs ability to manage the packaging work flow better
  • Sometimes is slow to download and there is no indication the entire catalog is being loaded, resulting in confused users not being able to find common software in the available list.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It is not user-friendly for the most part. With IT infrastructure, sometimes it cannot handle excess requests. Every few months, you will need an upgrade in terms of server resources to keep up with incoming alerts and requests. This does not happen all of the time, but it does happen when there are too many requests.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
If I had to dislike something about the system it would be how much it changes once you upgrade. This could be more of a problem of mine since I get used to one way and don't like it when it changes so much. I am enjoying the newest update, but it is a mess when you are actually going through the upgrades.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
- Breadth of service—Event and incident management, Automation capabilities, root cause analysis—IBM's brand image As I was not involved in the purchasing decision, I am not aware of all the reasons why this product was selected.
Read full review
Microsoft
We previously used a mix of FOG and Clonezilla to image machines. The biggest issues with these products is that changing one piece of the image required you to rebuild the entire image itself. These pieces of software also did not allow you to manage applications and Windows Updates, causing IT to have to constantly touch machines after they were imaged and update or manage them with a much more hands on approach.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Reduce downtime and improve service availability.
  • Enhance productivity.
  • Reduce cost and decision making.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • We have been able to automate our patch management, firmware and other security concerns.
  • We have a standardized "image" ensuring our setup is consistent across the enterprise. This alone has saved us in time to support and time to understand how to use our desktops.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM AIOps Insights Screenshots

Screenshot of Automated incident remediationScreenshot of IntegrationsScreenshot of Contextual insightsScreenshot of Topology