TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cursor

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/ACursor is an IDE and code editor built for programming with AI. Cursor includes an autocomplete that predicts the next edit. Once enabled, it is always on and will suggest edits to code across multiple lines.

    $30

    per month

    IBM Bob

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AIBM Bob is an AI-assisted development tool designed to support developers across the software development lifecycle. It helps interpret developer intent and provides assistance when working with real-world codebases by using contextual awareness of the surrounding project.N/A
    Pricing
    CursorIBM Bob
    Editions & Modules
    Team - Premium
    $30
    per month
    Team - Super
    $100
    per month
    Team - Ultimate
    $200
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CursorIBM Bob
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsCursor is now available as part of The X Subscription. A discount is available for annual billing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CursorIBM Bob
    Considered Both Products
    SpaceX
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    Chose IBM Bob
    Depends on the use cases. I actually moved away from Cursor due to their version of Desktop mode (it interrupted my workflow). I think the auto model picker is the best in the game, but I would still like a manual option, and the version control is very robust, unlike the …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Bob
    We evaluated Cursor alongside IBM Bob. Cursor is an excellent general-purpose AI development tool and is particularly strong for modern technologies such as Python, TypeScript, React, and APIs. However, IBM Bob was a better fit for our IBM i/Infinium environment because of its …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Bob
    Each tool has its own strengths. For specific tasks, like Java modernization, IBM Bob excels. The building team really invested in system prompts and model training. That's why harness engineering is so important these days. When you sum up great models with well-trained tools, …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    96%
    Would buy again
    120 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    92 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    121 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    90%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    73 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    93 Answers
    User Ratings
    CursorIBM Bob
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (11 ratings)
    8.9
    (126 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.4
    (11 ratings)
    8.4
    (126 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CursorIBM Bob
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SpaceX
    Less appropriate for people who don't use LLMs to code but instead to create artifacts. Cursor is a fluid development platform, not something that will create an artifact to run in the cloud. Well designed to work on teams, to manage the code and how the LLMs interact with the code itself. Great for deep vibe coding.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Really good fit: - Getting started with IBM i development - Getting an overview of a process or program which you have never seen before - Teaching about general IBM i usage (but you have to ignore the edits of system values on the machine) Not good to use: - If you expect working and fully analyzed modernization projects - If you rely on the correctness of the code, because you don't understand the overall syntax of the language - Working with column based RPG II code - Working on very complex systems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    SpaceX
    • API creation.
    • Integrations
    • Plan mode for large tasks.
    • Refactoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Fluency in COBOL RPG, and modernizing them into cloud ready frameworks. It compressed a 30 day migration down to 3 days
    • "Plan mode" creates dependency maps and multi-page technical specification drafts. Helps eradicate research overhead. It outputs a 20+ page convert blueprint in minutes
    • Generates end to end automated test suites and native browser validation. Helps extreme QA sprint efficiency without expanding headcount
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    SpaceX
    • The CLI agent can be quite finicky via ACP.
    • It can be hard to understand how much different models will cost.
    • Support can be unresponsive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Would like to see more personalization capabilities. Bob does a good job reading code and adapting to a given style, but there should be more specific personalization settings.
    • A more detailed understanding of how Bobcoins are spent would be welcome. This will help adapt to more efficient prompting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    SpaceX
    Cursor is the best AI-powered IDE available today. The agents intelligently absorb context from the code, memory, and rules, and are capable of iterating with subagents until acceptance criteria is met.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    SpaceX
    Cursor is useful for all our developer team. Each and every team member use Cursor for coding and also Cursor has various models like composer, codex, claude and openai models which helps a lot for quality codings. Also Cursor help to create documents in md file format with markdown and preview which helps a lot.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    IBM Bob functions well with its IDE. The interface is very versatile and configurable. But "out of the box" it is already very useful. And being able to specify which mode of operation it should use (ask, design, etc.) helps your focus and helps to tailor IBM Bob to the function you want it to perform, instead of having to write it all out in prompts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    SpaceX
    graphical user interface is really the thing that setting apart because other code harnesses are really focused on commandline interfaces but whenever you want a good graphical interface with all of the tools and workflow that us software developers we want I think that Cursor is the one that has done it the best out of all of the code harnesses that we’ve tried
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    I selected IBM Bob primarily because of his training and the quality of the information he provides. Yo selecione IBM Bob principalmente por como fue entrenado y la calidad de la information que TE provee
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    SpaceX
    • Development speed increased at least 25%
    • The result of the final Product is better than before/without it
    • We use it as a standard now
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Reduce the delivery time of the activities
    • improves the quality of the products
    • improves the quality of life of people
    • Reduce el tiempo de entrega de Las actividades
    • mejora la calidad de Los prouctos
    • mejora la calidad de vida de Las personas
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots