Invited by the Vendor
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Cloud Functions | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Google Cloud Functions enables users to run code in the cloud with no servers or containers to manage. Cloud Functions is a scalable, pay-as-you-go functions as a service (FaaS) product to help build and connect event driven services with simple, single purpose code. | N/A |
IBM Cloud Code Engine | Score9.7 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Cloud Code Engine is a fully managed, serverless platform that unifies the deployment of containers and applications including web apps, microservices, event-driven functions, or batch jobs. This serverless compute service aims to remove the burden of building, deploying, and managing workloads in Kubernetes so users can focus on writing code and not on the infrastructure that is needed to host it. With IBM Cloud Code Engine users can run any workload… | N/A |
| Google Cloud Functions | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud Functions | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Would buy again 14 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Happy with the feature set 14 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 10 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | |
| Google Cloud Functions | IBM Cloud Code Engine | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Control and Security |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Reporting & Analytics |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Function as a Service (FaaS) |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud Functions | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Functions Score6.5 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | AWS Lambda Score8.3 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | AWS Lambda Score8.3 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Google Cloud Functions | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.7 | 6.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.2 |
| Usability | 7.0 | 6.2 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Google Cloud Functions | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Cloud Code Engine Screenshots |