IBM Cloud Managed Istio vs. NGINX Ingress Controller

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloud Managed Istio
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
The IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service provides the Managed Istio installation add on, designed to provide additonal control over clusters and the microservices they comprise via automatic updates and lifecycle management of control plane components, and integration with platform logging and monitoring tools.N/A
NGINX Ingress Controller
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
NGINX Ingress Controller is a traffic management solution for cloud‑native apps in Kubernetes and containerized environments.N/A
Pricing
IBM Cloud Managed IstioNGINX Ingress Controller
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Managed IstioNGINX Ingress Controller
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud Managed IstioNGINX Ingress Controller
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
IBM Cloud Managed IstioNGINX Ingress Controller
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Managed Istio
8.0
5 Ratings
2% below category average
NGINX Ingress Controller
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces6.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability7.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead7.85 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration8.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification8.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery8.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes7.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Managed Istio
-
Ratings
NGINX Ingress Controller
7.8
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cloud Managed IstioNGINX Ingress Controller
Small Businesses
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.0 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cloud Managed IstioNGINX Ingress Controller
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(5 ratings)
7.9
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cloud Managed IstioNGINX Ingress Controller
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Clearly, the [IBM Cloud Managed Istio] tool is very useful when you have multiple services and each service is connecting with other services through APIs in different networks. To manage this type of complex network, [IBM Cloud Managed Istio] is very useful. It comes with a license that can increase the billing of your project so make sure if your application network mesh, monitoring cannot be managed on your own then you can use it. If your application is not very complex then you have many tools available like Grafana, Prometheus, Sumo Logic, which you can integrate individually with your cluster and implement. In this type of scenario, it is better to not use [IBM Cloud Managed Istio] and it will serve your purpose as well.
Read full review
F5
Best suited if we have to manage external traffic inside your Kubernetes cluster and want to use granular control to your applications.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Layers transparently onto existing applications
  • Allows control of access and rules to be developed
  • Creates metrics for usage
Read full review
F5
  • Provide access to containers
  • Manage traffic
  • Route traffic
  • Lightweight
  • Near to zero downtime
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Some more functionalities added could improve it better.
  • Better technical user guidance.
Read full review
F5
  • Its not related to Ingress functionality but certificate management with cloud vendor would be a feature i would like to see.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
Training and usage support available
Read full review
F5
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Read full review
F5
We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, traffic management among other features which was why it was chosen.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It reduced the complexity of network mesh (ingress/egress services).
  • One tool with many solutions. No need to integrate monitoring tools or notification tools.
  • It reduced the number of lines of YAML code.
  • It reduced the number of labor hours.
Read full review
F5
  • Security is one of the best objective which we achieve with NGINX Ingress
  • Cost optimization is one of the business objective
Read full review
ScreenShots