IBM Cloud Pak for Applications vs. Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() IBM Cloud Pak for Applications | Score7.2 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Cloud Pak® for Applications (CP4Apps) is an end-to-end hybrid cloud application platform, providing flexibility for deployments, building new cloud-native applications, refactoring and re-platforming existing applications. Designed to leverage a collection of application runtimes, modernization tools and a Kubernetes container platform to adapt to their landscape needs. | N/A |
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Score7.3 out of 10 | N/A | Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated. | N/A |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Applications | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Cloud Pak for Applications | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Applications | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Cloud Pak for Applications | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | NativeScript Score4.8 out of 10 | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | SAP Extension Suite (discontinued) Score8.4 out of 10 | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Applications | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.2 | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Applications | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Usability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
|
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |


