IBM Confluent vs. Oracle SOA Suite
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Confluent | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
Oracle SOA Suite | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | The rapid adoption of cloud-based applications by the enterprise, combined with organizations’ desire to integrate applications with mobile technologies, is dramatically increasing application integration complexity. Oracle SOA Suite 12c, the latest version of the company's unified application integration and SOA solution, offers a simplified cloud, mobile, on-premises and Internet of Things (IoT) integration capabilities within a single platform. | N/A |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle SOA Suite | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Oracle SOA Suite | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
94% Would buy again 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
94% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
88% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle SOA Suite | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle SOA Suite | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.6 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.0 |
| Usability | 7.4 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 6.0 |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle SOA Suite | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |
