IBM Confluent vs. Red Hat AMQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Confluent
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments.
$385
per month
Red Hat AMQ
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat AMQ—based on open source communities like Apache ActiveMQ and Apache Kafka—is a presented as a flexible messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).N/A
Pricing
IBM ConfluentRed Hat AMQ
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
Standard
Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise
Starting at ~$1,150
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM ConfluentRed Hat AMQ
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsConfluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM ConfluentRed Hat AMQ
Best Alternatives
IBM ConfluentRed Hat AMQ
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.1 out of 10
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM ConfluentRed Hat AMQ
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM ConfluentRed Hat AMQ
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Pros
IBM
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Cons
IBM
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It enables us to develop event driven application.
  • It increases our ability to handle streaming data.
  • It reduces latency of communication.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots