TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Db2 Big SQL vs. Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Db2 Big SQL

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AIBM offers Db2 Big SQL, an enterprise grade hybrid ANSI-compliant SQL on Hadoop engine, delivering massively parallel processing (MPP) and advanced data query. Big SQL offers a single database connection or query for disparate sources such as HDFS, RDMS, NoSQL databases, object stores and WebHDFS.N/A

    JBoss Data Virtualization

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AJBoss Data Virtualization is a data integration solution that sits in front of multiple data sources and allows them to be treated as a single source, to deliver the right data, in the required form, at the right time to any application and/or user. Also presented as a lean, virtual data integration solution that unlocks trapped data and delivers it as easily consumable, unified, and actionable information. Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization makes data spread across physically diverse…N/A
    Pricing
    Db2 Big SQLJBoss Data Virtualization
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Db2 Big SQLJBoss Data Virtualization
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Db2 Big SQLJBoss Data Virtualization
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cloudera Manager (no longer available standalone)
    Score9.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Hadoop
    Score7.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Db2 Big SQLJBoss Data Virtualization
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.8
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Db2 Big SQLJBoss Data Virtualization
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    My recommendation obviously would depend on the application. But I think given the right requirements, IBM DB2 Big SQL is definitely a contender for a database platform. Especially when disparate data and multiple data stores are involved. I like the fact I can use the product to federate my data and make it look like it's all in one place. The engine is high performance and if you desire to use Hadoop, this could be your platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Data Services is a top choice for JEE applications. Even though lots of documentation is available, it's difficult in terms of usability. If the development is more based on Java applications it is a good choice. It provides better installation and integrations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • data storage
    • data manipulation
    • data definitions
    • data reliability
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Data source compatibility: since it is Java, it can connect to anything with a JDBC driver.
    • Flexibility: you can configure it however you want, we have it configured to use LDAPS for authentication and have all interfaces encrypted, and setting that up was pretty straight forward.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Cloud readiness.
    • Ease of implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Pricing
    • User Interface
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    IBM DB2 is a solid service but hasn't seen much innovation over the past decade. It gets the job done and supports our IT operations across digital so it is fair.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    IBM did a good job of supporting us during our evaluation and proof of concept. They were able to provide all necessary guidance, answer questions, help us architect it, etc. We were pleased with the support provided by the vendor. I will caveat and say this support was all before the sale, however, we have a ton of IBM products and they provide the same high level of support for all of them. I didn't see this being any different. I give IBM support two thumbs up!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    Support availability and resolution response time make it a better choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    MS SQL Server was ruled out given we didn't feel we could collapse environments. We thought of MS-SQL as more of a one for one replacement for Sybase ASE, i.e., server for server. SAP HANA was evaluated and given a big thumbs up but was rejected because the SQL would have to be rewritten at the time (now they have an accelerator so you don't have to). Also, there was a very low adoption rate within the enterprise. IBM DB2 Big SQL was not selected even though technically it achieved high scores, because we could not find readily available talent and low adoption rate within the enterprise (basically no adoption at the time). We ended up selecting Exadata because of the high adoption rate within the enterprise even though technically HANA and Big SQL were superior in our evaluations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    Market value and support extended by Redhat is the winner against Veritas. It has cool features and functionality but still, if your organization is Redhat shop it's better to go for the Jboss option.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • better data visibility
    • solid reliability for mission critical data
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • It has allowed us to start moving applications independent from their underlying data sources, savings us time and limiting cutover effort.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots