TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM DevOps Code ClearCase vs. Progress Telerik Fiddler

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM DevOps Code ClearCase

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/AAn enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets.N/A

    Progress Telerik Fiddler

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AFiddler is a suite of products from Progress Telerik, designed to help users with web debugging and troubleshooting.

    $12

    per month, billed annually

    Pricing
    IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Fiddler Everywhere - Pro
    $12
    per month per user
    Fiddler Everywhere - Pro
    $18
    per month per user
    Fiddler Everywhere - Enterprise
    $420
    per year per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—•The price of the Pro monthly plan is $18. •The price of the Pro annual plan is $12 per month, billed annually. •The price of the Enterprise plan is $35 per month, billed annually.
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Small Businesses
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Likelihood to Recommend
    3.3
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM DevOps Code ClearCaseProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM Rational ClearCase might be better suited for a smaller / simpler code base. Larger code bases really slow it down... but then again there are better alternatives out there for source control
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    I am a senior software engineer and I have actively made fiddler a requirement for all of our engineers to have on their laptops by default. I have recommended it to all web developers that I have worked with and contractors that I have worked with as it has saved my mental stability on numerous occasions when trying to show people details of various web requests when working on integrations between different systems This is an absolutely fantastic product that I have used in a technical capacity many, many times and I will always suggest it as a tool when someone is debugging specifically but also for initial development to see how the requests are formed and for sharing responses and requests details so that others can recreate the request that you have sent through right down to the smallest detail
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Rational ClearCase is excellent for handling versioning and branching. No other tool I've used has the depth that ClearCase has when it comes to handling complex branching scenarios and identifying where certain versions of particular files are within a particular configuration.
    • Rational ClearCase handles parallel development of many dependent applications really well.
    • The use of ClearCase Views to switch between projects and configurations is extremely convenient as opposed to the local workstation model of the competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    IBM
    • Extremely buggy.
    • Sometimes the repository gets locked for no reason.
    • Slow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    • The display could potentially become a bit more user-friendly over time, it's pretty easy to follow but for example, I always view the raw request/response information by default and this is not the default selection, being able to choose the default selection would be nice
    • Clearer information and options to reduce 'noise' when viewing the requests, there are often a lot of background requests being sent on a computer, you can filter to roughly see what you want and filter out things that you don't want but there are different types of requests and I can't see how to filter between those - possibly a feature but could be made easier to use potentially
    • Nothing else to put, this is a fantastic product so there isn't much else to suggest at this stage of using it and I have been using fiddler for years now in my role as a software engineer
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    If development is centrallized to one location and your company releases hundreds of customized versions of your software per year, then ClearCase is the best tool for managing the complexity of multiple versions of customized software. If your company has globally distributed development, then I'd recommend Team Foundation Server over ClearCase. If your organization uses Agile Methodologies, then I'd recommend TFS with GIT.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Managed code versioning for many years.
    • Only one person can edit code at a time - slows processing down.
    • IBM is an expensive product to support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    • Overall this tool has sped up the process of integrating with new systems infinitely
    • The cost of fiddler everywhere which is what we use specifically is nothing in comparison to the cost of dev time saved when debugging processes
    • Being able to send information around so simply to other support teams to show them what responses we are getting along with the request detail have made communications much quicker and saves a lot of time going back and forth discussing what is being done and what the request is being sent
    Read full review
    ScreenShots