TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Integration Bus

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AIBM Integration Bus, replacing the former WebSphere Message Broker, is used to connect applications together, regardless of the message formats or protocols that they support. This connectivity helps to ensure diverse applications can interact and exchange data with other applications in a flexible, dynamic, and extensible infrastructure.N/A

    JBoss SOA Platform

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ARed Hat JBoss SOA Platform drives business execution, responsiveness, and flexibility in an open platform. It delivers what the vendor describes as an easy-to-consume service-oriented architecture (SOA) integration suite that lets users build, deploy, integrate, and orchestrate applications and services.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM Integration BusJBoss SOA Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Integration BusJBoss SOA Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    IBM Integration BusJBoss SOA Platform
    SOA Governance
    Comparison of SOA Governance features of IBM Integration Bus and JBoss SOA Platform
    Feature
    IBM Integration Bus
    -
    Ratings
    JBoss SOA Platform
    7.6
    1 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Service registry00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Service management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Service discovery00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Dependency management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Policy management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Integration BusJBoss SOA Platform
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Mule ESB
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    IBM DataPower Gateway
    Score9.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Integration BusJBoss SOA Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Integration BusJBoss SOA Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    Routing, protocol transformation, message transformation and service aggregation are very well performed by WebSphere Message Broker (WMB). It is not very suitable for integration with databases.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform is great when you are looking at building more or less pure Java applications and SOA micro-services that may integrate with multiple external data sources. It is less useful when you are looking to build simple SOA applications that are simple in nature since the overhead associated with deploying as well as learning BPEL.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Graphical data mapper
    • Support for different programming languages
    • Integration with MQ
    • Support for different parsers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • JBoss is open source so the cost overhead to deploy and build application is very low.
    • JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform and its parent Redhat are reputed and well adapted in the industry so it is easy to find best practices documentation for complex deployments of JBoss middleware.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Logging
    • Debugging
    • Code quality tools
    • Feature specific installation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform is dependent and build for JEE/Java application so using a different programming paradigm will be much harder.
    • There is still a learning curve to get familiar with BPEL making it harder to get an SOA micro-service up and running compared to a fully cloud-based service
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    Redhat support generally is great and that is true for the JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform as well. Even if you do not buy support from Redhat, you can reply on the discussion board and bug fixes via the open-source JBoss without much trouble.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Websphere message broker supports a lot more protocols than any other similar tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    Oracle SOA Suite (Oracle BPM + Oracle BPEL + other components) and IBM WebSphere middleware is most costly and suited if you are already using applications and other middleware components from these vendors. Mulesoft (Salesforce Mule ESB) is best when you need deep integration with one of Salesforce's existing products. JBoss and Apache Web Server are best when you do not want to invest infant CapEx/OpEx on license fee. Apache Web Server based middleware is best for simple SOA applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • It helped us in improving the speed to market for our services/APIs.
    • Learning curve is quite long
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Positive impact on the business by being able to use existing Java/JEE expertise to build and deploy applications and business services.
    • Positive ROI due to no license cost for JBoss Enterprise SOA.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots