IBM Integration Bus vs. Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() IBM Integration Bus | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Integration Bus, replacing the former WebSphere Message Broker, is used to connect applications together, regardless of the message formats or protocols that they support. This connectivity helps to ensure diverse applications can interact and exchange data with other applications in a flexible, dynamic, and extensible infrastructure. | N/A |
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Score7.3 out of 10 | N/A | Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated. | N/A |
| IBM Integration Bus | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Integration Bus | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | |
| IBM Integration Bus | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Integration Bus | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Mule ESB Score8.3 out of 10 | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() IBM DataPower Gateway Score9.5 out of 10 | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Integration Bus | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| IBM Integration Bus | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Usability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
|
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |


